this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Removing all of their institutional memory during an election year. Strong work.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully they funnel every dollar the RNC has at his legal bills instead of any election campaigning and hamstrings the party down-ballot.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm hoping they go to the fines and damages he owes. At least then it's not lining the pockets of shitty lawyers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hah, like trump pays his lawyers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Or his fines.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Drain that swamp?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Wiping away what scraps of diligence and record keeping they had little as it may seem

[–] [email protected] 84 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You mean that the experienced staff, whose jobs were to make sure that campaign finance laws are followed, are all let go, for some unfathomable reason? I wonder who they can get to replace them?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago

. . . more than 60 RNC staffers who work across the political, communications and data departments will be let go.

republiQans, you damned stupid bastards. Well, hey, it's what you wanted. I'm sure you're lovin' it. Actually, I'm sure you have no clue this is going on, and wouldn't know what it meant anyway.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago

I was hoping for an actual bloodbath, this is just infighting and the consolidation of power. Hoping it fucking cripples the RNC.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Fewer staffers means more money for Trump's legal bills 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

A lot of truth is said in jest

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This doesn't mean shit if Trump wins the Presidency.

But if he loses, this will seriously harm the RNC's ability to support any Republican candidates after this year.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Slowing them down after this is a plus, sure; but I'm still hung up on this: what would this let him get away with?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Trump is in full control of RNC spending. Money coming in, money going out, it all flows through Trump.

You can't be a Republican candidate without professing fealty to him.

Trump also has an MO which is give me everything, I give you nothing, so it's suspect that he'll use all funding for all candidates to line his own pockets which won't allow any other Republicans to compete in any of their races.

The danger to Republicans is that after this year if Trump doesn't secure the Presidential nomination, all funding still goes to Trump, and Republicans are still kissing the ring of a man who holds no power outside of his undying support by 30% of voting Americans and his connection to Putin.

What this tells me personally is that Republicans are all in on a Trump 2025 presidency, and my beliefs are that the rich and elite are too.

I'm fairly concerned for the General election and expect a few more Biden attacks, Russian disinformation, and an economic crash all to attempt to sink Biden below Trump

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I feel so sorry for those worker… oh wait. These are RNC folk. Basically just below cops in terms of being workers I would not support. Fuck them. I hope they never find work again. Fucking fascists.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago

I fucking love it. Downballot races: starve from the self inflicted famine you utter fucking nonces

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

For those wondering why Trump can't be allowed to take office again... here you go!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Trump draining the RNC of all its funds and power just to save his own ass would be a poetic end to this all.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

was “in the process of evaluating the organization and staff to ensure the building is aligned”

Well there it is. Basically eliminating criticism, kiss my ass or you’re out. Nice little purge on the small scale foreshadowing what he’d do as president.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Face eating leopards are eating good tonight!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Seems like we should get the investigations started now and save some time on the other end, eh?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Oh no, my face!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

We can but hope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Huh, guess it's just one more thing to bankrupt...