this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
150 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK — A seven-figure verdict, an eight-figure verdict and, now, a nine-figure verdict.

Donald Trump has been hit with all three in the past nine months, with Friday’s $354 million penalty for New York business fraud by far the most massive.

He is now on the hook for over $440 million in civil judgments as he heads toward the Republican nomination — and as he prepares for one or more criminal trials this year.

Those criminal cases could put him in jail. And in the meantime, his escalating troubles in his civil cases are packing a devastating financial punch.

Even for a man who claims to be a billionaire, $440 million is a potentially crippling amount of cash to turn over. Can Trump afford the judgments? When does he have to pay them? And what happens if he says he can’t — or if he outright refuses?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 9 months ago

Jones hasn't paid

Rudy hasn't paid

What makes Trump different?

It truly feels like there are zero repercussions for simply ignoring court orders

Which then makes me wonder why any of these guys ever even bothered for showing up to court since they all seemed to know the outcome would be irrelevant in practice.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Who cares? I hope he ends up in prison. Being penniless would just be icing.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago

I care. I don't want this weasel to con his way into a way to be president again and somehow pardon himself. It seems like for politicians there is always a way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I want him to a penniless, too. In a typical state prison, prisoners have to pay for even basic shit like hygiene supplies and snacks. It's barbaric and I want Trump to experience it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He'd go on the news and talk about how nobody knew that's how prisoners were treated, and that he's the first person in history to understand how bad prison is.

After spending an overnight stay in county jail.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

... And that's why I'm proud today to announce a newer, better solution; Trump private prisons. The biggest, best prisons, big beautiful prisons the likes of which, frankly... D'y'know we never had a prison like this before? It's unfathomable! It's really disgusting frankly, the way they claim this and that about the best prisons. That's why we've got to get rid of all this stuff standing in the way of doing what I think we... And we all know who I'm talking about here, don't we folks? It's a gigantic fraud and we've got to do something about it before it's too late, cause they're coming for the private prisons, and they're coming for your freedom, and we're not gonna let them, are we? Beautiful. Beautiful.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

The RNC is going to pay. Why else did he put a Trump in charge of it? It sucks for all the other Republicans who want RNC money, but they all have their PACs now anyway.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if the Saudis pay his bills. Especially if they think that by helping out he might be able to win the election. In fact, owning the president of the US for only 500m USD seems like it could be worth it to many nefarious characters. The Saudis didn't seem to have a problem doing a billion dollar deal with his son in law.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really don’t want a president, any president, with that sort of debt that they owe because I don’t trust them to not do unethical things to get rid of the debt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Being in debt can make it very difficult (if not impossible) to get national security clearance for that very reason.

Unfortunately, the President's clearance is automatic and absolute...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Headline is misleading. Article doesn't say what happens if he doesn't pay.

Which is his most favoured strategy.

So I'd really like to know.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

The article clearly states:

In the civil fraud case, which is in New York state court, if Trump can’t post the funds or get a bond, then the judgment would take effect immediately and a sheriff could begin seizing Trump’s assets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Here’s a link without their annoying cookie options:

https://archive.is/u2XGK

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Truly: how are such judgements supposed to be enforced?? Dock his pay?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

In the civil fraud case, which is in New York state court, if Trump can’t post the funds or get a bond, then the judgment would take effect immediately and a sheriff could begin seizing Trump’s assets.