this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
139 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
6058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Trump accused Fed Chair Powell of making politically motivated decisions on interest rates.
  • He said Powell is considering interest rate cuts this year to help Democrats.
  • Powell has emphasized he does not have a role in policymaking and will continue to weigh economic data.

——

The head of the nation's central bank isn't getting former President Donald Trump's stamp of approval.

On a Friday morning interview with Fox News, Trump criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's handling of the economy, particularly regarding interest rates. While Powell has previously maintained his position does not have anything to do with policymaking, Trump accused the bank's chair of being "political," and making decisions that will help Democrats in the upcoming elections.

"I think he's going to do something to probably help the Democrats, I think, if he lowers interest rates," Trump said, adding that "it looks to me like he's trying to lower interest rates for the sake of maybe getting people elected."

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Fed Chair Powell was appointed to the Fed by Donald Trump in 2017.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago

Exactly - In Trump's mind, that means Powell owes him and should only be making moves that help Trump get re-elected. The fact that it is or isn't the right move is of no consequence. He expects loyalty above all else.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Also, the Fed has been saying “we’ll lower it when inflation gets close to our 2% target”

This time last year we were around 6-7%, now we’re around 3 and a quarter.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Narcissistic Loser Blames Everyone But Self

fixed it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

It really does seem like Trump is mentally preparing himself and his followers for a big loss.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I need a plugin that swaps that in for every headline quoting him.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Forget the “left” or the “right”, Powell is there to aid the affluent with wealth preservation as his overarching goal while fucking the everyday citizen right in the asshole

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which is what both major political parties want.

Biden is 1000x better than trump, but if this is the best we can do, we're fucked as a country.

Wealth is going to keep concentrating and both parties are going to care less and less about democracy.

The DNC is just a decade or two behind the RNC. And as long as the only standard for a Dem is "better than the current republican" both will keep going down the shitter at the same rate, one is just starting from a lower position

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ugh. I hate that I agree with you. Nothing personal, of course! I just wish there was more to be optimistic about in regards to American politics.

I find I agree more and more with those that encourage people to get involved with local politics. It's such a long shot, but if there's any chance at fixing things from within the current system, it has to be at a local level.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

but if there’s any chance at fixing things from within the current system, it has to be at a local level.

Ask any blue city in a red state if local is enough...

That's where the solution starts, but this is like climate change. We're not going to fix it overnight, it's going to take decades of hard work and we're going to have to keep working to maintain it or it'll just happen again later.

We gotta try, but we need to be honest about how hard it is and how long it will take.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Powerful insight /u/DogPeePoo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Powell has the power to push exactly one button.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

And when we cut the interest rates to basically 0 under Trump that was to..

to help..

Jesus what party was in power then.. fuck its like I've got a 4 year brown out.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Every accusation is a projection.

So many of my business/econ friends called me an idiot when I told them part of our housing crisis is due to Trump keeping interest rates ridiculously low well after the it was needed to recover from the recession.

Cheap interest rates basically free money, because it's trivial to get a higher return on even conservative investments.

Naturally, a large portion of this money ended up in the real estate market as a "safe" investment.

Ohh, and what a coincidence. The sitting president happens to be a real estate mogul.

And I was resoundingly told that I have no clue what I'm talking about by the B.A.s. "Don't you even know that the fed interest rates are not controlled by the president? Lollllll what an idiot"

Guess they don't teach extremely obvious corruption in college.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Stupid fatass has main character syndrome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

That's pretty rich considering how much he overheated the economy during his time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

His claim was that the economy was doing well because people were expecting Trump to be re-elected. Fox News was parroting that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Interest is a crime against humanity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can I borrow money from you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I mean, I’ll break your arms if you don’t repay it, but only assholes charge interest ;)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, what's your take on contango?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I don’t know what that is

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On a Friday morning interview with Fox News, Trump criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's handling of the economy, particularly regarding interest rates.

While Powell has previously maintained his position does not have anything to do with policymaking, Trump accused the bank's chair of being "political," and making decisions that will help Democrats in the upcoming elections.

Trump's remarks come after the Federal Open Market Committee on Wednesday decided to continue its pause on interest rate hikes in its first move of 2024.

Powell has frequently emphasized that economic data will drive the committee's interest rate decisions over the course of the year, and he said it's important to move cautiously so as not to risk doing too little too soon.

However, some Democratic lawmakers have been urging Powell to consider cutting interest rates sooner rather than later to give Americans financial relief.

Elizabeth Warren, John Hickenlooper, Jacky Rosen, and Sheldon Whitehouse sent a letter to Powell saying that "interest rates are still too high for many American families, who already cannot afford to pay rent or buy their first homes."


The original article contains 429 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!