this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
52 points (94.8% liked)

Canada

7166 readers
256 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(By Noushin Ziafati/CTV News)

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't understand what's so complicated about "act first, sort out funding later." It took years of court cases to sort it out for Indigenous health care and that was the conclusion. With that concept formalized in one area of jurisdictional conflict, it shouldn't be rocket science to just go ahead and apply it in others.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's not rocket science, it's bureaucracy!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With what funding? Taxes have been dropping around the country and governments are perpetually underfunded.

We should be lobbying for higher property tax rates so that municipalities actually have the flexibility to "act first, fund later".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Higher property taxes for multi-home or corporate owners, higher corporate taxes, break up the oligopolies, etc.

I feel like a broken telephone. But if we say it enough maybe it will actually happen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Higher taxes in general and specifically for non owner-occupied rental properties. It'll drive down real estate demand and incentize actually filling rentals with tenants.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The phrase is "broken record" lol

Never heard of a telephone that repeats itself when it's broken.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You are most definitely correct πŸ™ƒ

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

what's so complicated about "act first, sort out funding later."

"Do it perfectly the first time or we'll sue like it's America."

I'm glad if indigenes are treated like proper Canadians in healthcare. All bodies are the same, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t understand what’s so complicated about β€œact first, sort out funding later.”

That is exactly what they did, and see what happened. They brought in a good number of refugees without assessing their ongoing needs and how much it would cost to meet them. We all suffer the consequences now, and the solution you propose is to repeat the same mistake again?

Before any further rash decisions are made we need to sit down, be rational, and see what we can afford to do. Chow has made a very good point: since the Federal government is responsible for bringing in refugees, they should be ultimately responsible for bearing the cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I see that I didn't follow the chain of causality far enough back. I think you are correct in that it's a federal funding issue.

So what happens now? Do we leave these people to rot in the streets while fighting for funding or find a way to shelter them while fighting for funding?