this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
284 points (80.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3922 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, and I hate to play Devil's advocate to this bullshit, but the US tried to share their "lessons learned" with Israel. The US repeatedly told Israel to not go full in like the US had done in Iraq and Afghanistan (read Felluja). After Fallujah, the US changed tactics and took a more "small strikeforce", infiltrate and assassinate approach. Israel basically told the US to shut the fuck up and just started blasting.

There's nobody better in the world to tell you how to avoid war crimes than someone with decades of experience in committing war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The US repeatedly told Israel

While sending them 3 billion a year, if they wanted them to stop they would threaten to stop sending the money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You're right. If the US stopped sending them money their military budget would only be 20 billion a year.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

So anyway, they started blasting...

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tired of "every political problem is US fault," so I'm kicking the can.

Anything you want to blame on the US is Britain's fault.

They failed to suppress the colonial revolution, and odds are, also caused whatever problems the US gets told to go police as the UN lapdog.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I blame proto indo Europeans

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Fuckin Lucy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What have they ever done for us?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system, and public health ... what have the Romans ever done for us?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Brought peace?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems to me that this is the one political position the author has: "America bad." And everything follows from there. Russia invades Ukraine: Actually it's America's fault, because NATO expansion is violating non-existent treaties. Israel bombs Gaza and does the crimes against humanities: Actually it's America's fault, because Israel is just imitating America.

This seems like the usual "what aboutism" from Russian or Chinese propaganda.

What Israel did is really really bad, but America didn't force them to do it. And America's response of unconditional support is also bad, but they generally didn't want this conflict, because it's not useful to their agenda.

America does enough bad stuff, no need to invent more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tired of “every political problem is US fault,” so I’m kicking the can.

That's the impression the article title gives you - and it gave me, also - but when you read it I think you'll realise it's far more than mere hyperbole.


Edit: Also, all the great bits about Great Britain are not English. It's primarily the English (as well as a few Scottish aristocrats) who perpetrated all the colonial bullshit.

Bring back the Normans, I say. The only people who successfully conquered Britain in 1,000 years. Technically, the Channel Islands is the last Norman refuge. I'd quite happily have the Bailiwick of Guernsey rule over the UK - not Jersey though, they're a bunch of toffs and should stay on their own Island, where the rest of the Tories can be deported to.

But I genuinely think you should read the article, all the way, if you haven't yet.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Decades of US unconditional support for Israeli war crimes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And general meddling in other countries in the name of preventing the spread of communism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That hasn't been the rallying cry in decades.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

You’re right. Before communism we did it to get cheap bananas. And after communism we did it because we created a bunch of terrorists that we now had to fight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

~~preventing the spread of communism~~ encouraging democracy and freedom

Like continuously bribing the Pakistan army to remove the elected government

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, I went into the article thinking it was biased and sensationalist, but it seems like the author was entirely on point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for making me read it. It's a great article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. Its the US's fault. Now stop.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's worth giving the article a read. It compares US attacks in Iraq with Israel in Gaza, and draws comparison with the "human shield" excuse that both have been using to dismiss civilian casualties. It also goes into the US' weak interpretation of the Geneva convention and how Israeli lawyers are basically saying "they got away with it, so should we!"

The article doesn't say it was the US' fault, it says that the US paved the way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oof. There's so much conflation and handwaving here it really reads like propaganda that requires buy in on an concept first.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, US policy in Middle East was far from ideal, but example given in article for US massive bombardments were about fight with ISIS. I do not think you can get moral ground by criticizing that. ISIS should have been fought and exterminated.

Yes there is parallel with what Israel is doing with Hamas. But use this analogy to think about that it is not as black and white as most people here pretend to be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right now every participant in conflict has committed numerous crimes. There is ho moral high ground for anybody. Every side is lying through their teeth to achieve their goals. People of Israel and Palestine are dying while selected few in Israeli and Palestinians get richer and consolidate power in their hands. Both sides have been solidly brainwashed against each other. It'd take enormous effort to stabilize things. I have not seed anyone fitting the bill.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that I do not see solution with Hamas and current right wing government in Israel in power. But if the government in Israel can be (and likely will be after these events) changed in democratic elections, no such luck with Hamas. Hamas leaders already are promising multiple repeats of recent massacre. Their whole ideology is based on destruction of Jews from the very beginning of founding of this organization. If peace is to happen in future I just see no path other than forceful removal of them from the power. Do you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that I do not see solution with Hamas and current right wing government in Israel in power.

agreed

Unfortunately adding "2 + 2" I come to the same conclusion. The only chance for this to stop is external force. Whether it's weapon supply to Hamas or them getting ostracized by Arab world (I mean Hamas, not Palestinians). Democratic shift in Israel is a necessary prerequisite too however it can't come with a weakening of Israel or we'll be witnessing Holocaust v2. Most of my life I despised Israel for what they did to Palestine however in light of recent events I believe militarily they ought to be strong to prevent any further attempts at genocide of Israelis and they should stay within their own borders

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you describe they did it for 17 years - blockade. It did not work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

not quite. Palestine never got it's independence and never had government concerned with Palestine development rather than external threats. I do not recall anybody attempting to aid Palestine to become independent. Israel's "aid" was used as means of control.

I'm talking about two countries going their own way. That never happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›