Democracy: A democratically run community.

105 readers

1 users here now

A community dedicated to democracy!

Where mods will be elected on a regular basis, and can be repealed, and decisions are made as a community.

Rules with regards to how the community is run can be changed, as long as they don't serve to prevent oppression of groups or speech.

Community rules:

Posting/Commenting rules:

Be civil - No personal attacks, flaming, hate speech, baiting, trolling, doxing, etc.
No bigotry or racism. This is an inclusive space.
No low-effort or title-only posts.
Use article titles and source & don't editorialize
Don't use all capital letters in titles.
Don't downvote based on your opinion.
No inciting posting & bad faith arguing.
Report users who violate rules.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Democracy with negative votes (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are a few alternative voting systems to chose from, for how elections will work in democracies. Scoring seems to be the best one. But I haven't heard anybody discuss negative votes.

f people could turn up just to vote against a candidate, or against all candidates, then a lie more people would turn up to vote.

Additionally, very unpopular candidates would no longer win elections.

Take Trump vs Clinton for a good example. Both were very unpopular. Many people were not really voting for one, but against the other.

In a system with negative votes, both of them would have finished with negative totals. A third party candidate with the most broad support would have won.

This shows how a system with negative votes could lead to a better (and more democratic) outcome. But is there a flaw or drawback? Why is this type of system not more favoured?

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here