520
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago

HTML5 + CSS3 is Turing complete, but just basic html is not.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

how does something get tested for turing completeness

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

@jackpot @KittyCat implementing a brainfuck interpreter for it is a useful method

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Just about the only good reason for Brainfuck.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

@frezik I mean that's literally it's purpose. being a minimal turing complete language.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

I could be wrong, but I don't think the creators envisioned it being a basis for easily proving the Turing Completeness of other languages, but it did. They were more thinking "how can I have the most fucked up language in the smallest package and still be Turning Complete?"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
520 points (96.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1838 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS