this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22524 readers
56 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
-
Posts about mental health should go in [email protected] you are loved here :meow-hug: but !mentalhealth is much better equipped to help you out <3.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I lived through this.
One of the reasons we sympathise with the Palestinians so much is we know all the rhetorical tricks used to justify colonialism. We see through them coz they were used here. e.g.
They claim that there was never such a nation as "Palestine", that the nationalism is a lie. Well we had that here: revisionist historians like Gerald Cambrensis trying to say it was always a unified British Isles.
They say Palestinians in Israel can vote and are nominally equal. Well then why are Palestinians 21% of Israel but 8% of the Knesset? And we had the same here in Stormont and Westminster: Catholics could vote but they had half the voting-power
Also the word "terrorist" is a big rhetorical parallel. Most of my life the word "terrorist" meant "Northern Irish"; it was only around 2000±2 that it started to mean "Muslim". And if you're fighting "terrorists" you can do anything
I'm ashamed people said this to the Irish when they should have given them a hard time for failing to kill Thatcher.