this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
9 points (71.4% liked)
Public Health
377 readers
1 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, this study seems flawed in that they are only looking at people visiting emergency rooms for cannabis. Not very many people do that in the first place, and the people that do likely are the ones to show symptoms of anxiety and paranoia. On top of that, it doesn't look at usage, nor the type of cannabis consumed.
9/10 times I stay away from magazine science because they always fuck up the actually important part of science and get the details wrong or mucked up.
They’re never better than the original birth peoples work