this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
157 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
157
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

rage-cry I whined about cracker being a slur and those mean ol Hexbears just called me a cracker more instead of debating merage-cry

ppb-gigachad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (51 children)

It doesn't have the connotation of a slur, but it's undeniably "a derogatory race-based term." I don't see how an in-person organization in the U.S. could be successful while allowing that, so it's always struck me as extremely online that we do.

This is a case of "page of reactionary screed that includes one decent point made poorly," and us being reflexively contrarian, which is 90% right when dealing with reactionaries but still leaves some considerable blind spots.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (46 children)

Anyone who is not joining because of the word Cracker was never gonna join

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's too much of a determined take. Why not make a more appropriate (i.e. seems more likely) kinda claim:

Anyone who appears to be not joining because of the word Cr*cker was likely not going to join*

* without an amount of effort which could likely be better used elsewhere, towards materially marginalized groups, fomenting solidarity, organizing, etc.

NOTE: I try to give others a chance at least. Thankfully comrades such as yourself and others can operate more pragmatically rather than with naïvety and so can cover my blind spots

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

jesse-wtf

I dont think i got your last paragraph

load more comments (44 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)