this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

hexbear

10143 readers
1 users here now

Now that the old Hexbear fork has been officially abandoned, this community will be used as a space for meta-discussion on the site itself.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't think I really need to explain much, their admins are transphobic. stalin-smokin

https://hexbear.net/post/1587342

Snowe, an admin, complained about a transgender person being offended over being misgendered. Ategon made an apology post but keeps snowe on, no public apologies from snowe to the transgender people affected.

Textbook very-smart

note: conversation about Ategon's use of the word triggered edited out, might be misunderstanding, need clarified

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (19 children)

Used triggered in the sense I typically do with coding which is the action of triggering an event to occur. Ive edited it to started to make it more clear

Gotcha, thanks.

the comment from snowe was due to it not being relevant to the initial argument rather than targeting the content of the pronoun response itself, It is ambiguous when reading though. Ive been mostly talking to blahaj for now since thats been taking all my free time for the start of the day but im going to say here sorry to you guys as well for this situation happening since it was mostly hexbear users in the conversation

I can accept this partially (and will only agree to it if the other trans people in that thread, principally of which, @[email protected], agrees to accept it) , though the comments in the instance admin thread are vile, and many are attacking @[email protected] and calling her an idiot or a troll for wanting to be gendered correctly. Will this be rectified, will bans be handed out to obvious transphobes?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

Im trying to deal with the situation but this has been a pain to try to manage especially since its workdays, going to try to deal with the uncivil comments in the thread. Usually we do a multiple strike system for this kind of thing since people can change

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The comment that was removed was:

Wow this Kuori person is a massive idiot. They to refer to a 3rd party is basic English.

You gave the reason for its removal as:

be civil, you have a point but you dont have to call someone an idiot for it

What do you mean by this? In what way does this transphobe have a point?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

sorry my bad with that wording. Point there is referring to them having a point they are attempting to argue which is the second part of that comment (the they section). Point in the context just refers to an argument rather than the supporting of an argument. Realize now that it can be interpreted pretty differently from what i intended edit: updated it to just be the be civil part

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)