Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2303 readers

295 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

147

US adults found to eat a meal's worth of calories in snacks each day (medicalxpress.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Snacks constitute almost a quarter of a day's calories in U.S. adults and account for about one-third of daily added sugar, a new study suggests.

Researchers analyzing data from surveys of over 20,000 people found that Americans averaged about 400 to 500 calories in snacks a day—often more than what they consumed at breakfast—that offered little nutritional value.

Though dietitians are very aware of Americans' propensity to snack, "the magnitude of the impact isn't realized until you actually look at it," said senior study author Christopher Taylor, professor of medical dietetics in the School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences at The Ohio State University.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The top five sources of calories aren't even food fit for human consumption. 😵😵😵

And with people allegedly unable to afford food, it really makes me wonder if it's because they are spending all their money on these (expensive) top five calorie sources, rather than... I don't know, real food? 🧐

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe people eat this kind of food because they live in food deserts where fresh food is unavailable, or because highly processed junk food is cheaper than real food and the cost of living is rising much faster than wages, or because people who are forced to work multiple jobs to survive don't have time to cook healthy meals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I would disagree, and here's why:

The bulk of our calories should be coming from carbs, and healthy carb staples are very cheap and readily available anywhere: rice, flour, pasta, etc.

Food deserts, while I don't deny exist, aren't a problem for the majority of the population. Most people living near any city over 100,000 likely have access to multiple grocery stores.

The cost argument falls flat when you consider that junk food, alcoholic beverages, meat and dairy, and high calorie nonalcoholic beverages cost a lot more than real food staples.

Availability and cost really only impact fruit and vegetable consumption, but historically, most Americans have never consumed enough regardless (unless they were vegetation/vegan). It's a cultural thing, I'm sure.

A breakdown of food spending also indicates that a large proportion of food spending tends to be "eating out", which is not cost effective and gives a good indication that people are often misspending their food budget.

The issue of time is also not a good reason when throwing ingredients in a basic pressure cooker, rice cooker, or , slow cooker takes minutes and you can batch cook an entire week's worth of food with minimal cost and effort. As with the point above, it takes more time to eat out, and learning to prepare basic meals is a skill that every adult should have.

Eating cheap and healthy isn't impossible, but someone needs to be willing to at least break their poor eating habits first.