Games

32257 readers

1276 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

331

Bethesda Is Responding to Negative Reviews of Starfield on Steam (www.ign.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

177 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 61 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Some of Starfield’s planets are meant to be empty by design — but that's not boring. “When the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there. They certainly weren't bored." The intention of Starfield's exploration is to evoke a feeling of smallness in players and make you feel overwhelmed.

May as well boot up SpaceEngine then.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Starfield, the epitome of scientifically correcty simulations. Why would I expcet my Starship Travel Simulator 2000 to be a fun-focused game after all, durr.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

scientifically correct

Why doesn’t nasa just open up the starmap and simply fast travel to the moon or mars?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

they do basically except they give spacex a chunk of money to have their rocket tp them

load more comments (1 replies)