this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
136 points (91.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29709 readers
1074 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From the lore of the Predator species, a Predator who goes for a hunt is trying to prove they are worthy of adult status in their society. As each Predator dies in the film they fail to attain adult status in their society.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

That's non-sequitur. Predators go on more than one hunt in their lives. Your statement would only be valid if their 1st hunt was their only one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

That's not what non-sequitur means.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

How do you define it, then? The definition I'm aware of is for an inference that doesn't follow from the premise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Your definition for non-sequitur is correct, however the conclusion that Predators are failing to come of age is a logical conclusion of the stated premise. The actual issue, which you pointed out, is that of using a false or faulty premise (that all Predators in the movies are on their first hunts). The validity of an argument isn’t a function of how true a premise is. So you were right that op was wrong in their conclusions, you just mislabeled the issue

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)