this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
621 points (98.9% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics

3137 readers
1 users here now

A community for Dungeons and Dragons Memes and Comics

/c/DnD Network Communities

Rules (Subject to Change)

"Title" - [Comic Name]

e.g. "Krak of Dawn" - [Swords Comic]

*Does not apply to memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Thats literally not a critical success though. Your example of doing critical successes right is not having critical successes

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Flavor the failure to a success then: in an impossible feat of strength, you managed to lift the iron gate high enough for a small creature to crawl through.

Then, depending on how important this situation is for progressing the narrative (whether you as the DM want them to get through or not), you have options to build on their success. Do they have a small creature in their party? Will they be willing to split the party? Do they have the strength to continue holding it up or is there a risk someone would be crushed crawling under? Or maybe their crit success was enough to move it but not enough to hold it at all for a chance for any one to get through.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats not a critical success. You are describing a normal DM response to a high roll.

If its a crit success, they succeed in their attempted goal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Semantics I guess. I see your point and don't see a problem with a DM running things that way, but I don't think there's a problem with letting the players enjoy the idea of a critical success on their roll while keeping things functionally the same so as not to break the game.

load more comments (3 replies)