this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
395 points (97.4% liked)

Games

32575 readers
1710 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome to Aftermath, a worker-owned, reader-supported news site covering video games, the internet, and the cultures that surround them. Just launched today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No. The main reason people are worried about what happens to Valve when Gabe passes is because Gabe is the owner, he owns more than 50% of the company. Valve has done well under him but once he's out the picture and that more than 50% ownership is transferred to another person then who knows if the company will stay the same. After all that 50 makes the decisions about the company

If that 50 was split between the workers there would be less certainty about the potentially passing of ice person because the workers collectively uphold the company vision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have heard rumours that his son has a similar mindset. Though who knows, those rumours were on this site, plus even if they are true, he could just be pretending so that Gabe doesn't look into other options or he could change his mind after being told some enticing numbers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No company survives the third generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)