this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
266 points (97.2% liked)

Ukraine

8251 readers
867 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror:

Source: https://t.me/pravdaGerashchenko_en/29009

Russian propagandist Solovyov:

"We will not stop at Kyiv, Warsaw, Paris. We will stop when we feel secure."

What is security for Russia? The destruction of NATO?

Russia has been living in "counteraction and struggle" with external "bad enemies" for a very long time. This is how the Russian government consolidates society and explains all the problems to it.

Therefore Solovyov is right - they will not stop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (12 children)

lol. Blyats can’t take Ukraine and NATO hasn’t done more than supply weapons and intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

and not even the best boom-booms, either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In your opinion what are the best boom-booms of NATO, short of nuclear devices?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AGM-158 JASSM's with CHAMP packages. Stealth cruise missiles with anti-electronics packages. Would bring down the bloodshed significantly while disabling enemy communications, launchers, radar installations, etc. These can be fired by F-16s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electronics_High_Power_Microwave_Advanced_Missile_Project

The CHAMP is superior to other electronic warfare weapons because it destroys electronics, rather than jamming which temporarily affects systems that come back online when it stops being applied....
CHAMP is capable of up to 100 shots per sortie.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Known or suspected/hypothetical?

You gotta imagine the US has at least one or two publicly unknown weapon types socked away for a rainy day. At the outside, perhaps something crazy in the vein of Rods from God.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the u.s. does not export 'everything' (even when excluding nuclear devices) in its arsenal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You know that’s right.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

A single raptor would turn the whole russ*an air force into scrap metal. Like a quarter of the globes airspace would be enforced by that lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I suspect NATO would be able to deploy localized laser based anti drone weapons.

Maybe show-off their experimental ship based rail guns?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)