this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
153 points (95.3% liked)

memes

10258 readers
3397 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Did Anydesk do something shady?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Unless you can make it onto their whitelist, the free version of the app kicks you out of sessions after one hour. But most troubling, the paid version only allows a single outgoing connection to a computer. Want to connect to two different computers at the same time? Sorry bub, the license is now twice as expensive. Three computers? Thrice as expensive. Bafflingly, the free version allows you to connect to as many computers as you want at the same time. You actually get punished for paying for their software.

I'm willing to pay for a good service, but doubling the price for concurrent connections is just not sustainable, and it's a recently updated pricing model.

RustDesk offers all the same functionality I need from Anydesk, but it's free.

Edit: I am most certainly not finished with fully evaluating RustDesk as an Anydesk replacement, but after a day of deploying it across several computers, I'm optimistic about it's functionality and accessability.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Running earlier versions of 7, and occasionally deleting %programdata% when they start kicking you off gets around these limitations for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)