Technology

59436 readers

3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

"The (Trust and) Safety Dance" - When an ostensibly “social” company has a Trust and Safety department, try and see it for what it is: a sign that failure is an option. (www.staygrounded.online)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Lemmy might not ever influence global culture to the degree that Facebook and Twitter once did. But it proves that 'people constructively and healthily socializing via the internet' is entirely possible without being forced to tolerate any more nonsense than one would normally expect when humans get together. 'Social media: The Business' on the other hand cannot exist without the garbage."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But it proves that 'people constructively and healthily socializing via the internet' is entirely possible without being forced to tolerate any more nonsense than one would normally expect when humans get together.

This reads so fucking stupid to anyone who hung around on the internet in the 90s and earlier. Social media and the monetization of social interactions is built on top of the ways we interacted before, not the other way around. Wanting to communicate and interact is why we used the internet in the first place. Social media is relatively new, and the internet hasn't always been this frustrating to use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're not incorrect, but I think the thing that differentiates this era of social media from the "before times" (I was there too) is that it's significantly easier for non-techies to join. The internet nowadays has significantly more diversity of perspectives than back then. Those differences are exploited and exaggerated by social media companies to generate engagement. It seems to m that the fediverse model allows for diversity and sanity (or at least not algorithmically-encouraged _in_sanity).

Thanks for reading and the comment!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

More perspectives isn’t necessarily better.

The internet used to be a place full of educated people, because otherwise how are you going to get on here? The perspectives we’ve added are, for the most part, not valuable.

It’s true that we have added cultural/ethnic diversity, and women, and that’s grand. Pats on the back all round. But couldn’t we have only added the educated and curious folk? Technically minded and adventurous?

Lowering the barrier to entry for the internet was not done out of high-minded aspiration for a free market of ideals, it was done to sell ads to the lowest common denominator, who spends money like an idiot. It’s why every item on Amazon has a “finance” option now.

The internet was better when it was elitist, and I know that’s a bad thing to say. But I think everyone who was around in the 90s and early 2000s knows it’s true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the harsh words if it's your article :D you make good points.

load more comments (1 replies)