this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
191 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

48074 readers
792 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oracle responds to Red Hat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

they’ve been pretty good stewards of the Java open source project

I am pretty sure Google (the company itself) would say otherwise.

They've also been pretty horrible stewards of VirtualBox.

Oracle is not friends with open source. To be honest, I trust RedHat over Oracle and that's saying something.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh wow, I had blocked out the virtual box guest additions debacle/shake-down from my memory. It almost felt like entrapment, the way they went about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop here, what happened?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

VirtualBox is free and open source, the windows guest additions piece is not. However, they're both available for free download from the same site and they do not make any distinction between those two (at least at the time, haven't looked). They were waiting for companies to download the guest additions piece and going after them to shake down licensing fees. While I don't recall/know exactly, it seemed like they were almost exclusively going after companies they already had commercial relationships with to add more licensing fees to existing contracts. So yes, from my perspective they were shaking down customers after trying to entrap them with ambiguous free downloads. They had the legal right to do so, but it felt in bad faith.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)