TechTakes

1480 readers

234 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

156

Ukrainian surface drones had Starlink comms disabled on direct Musk's orders (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de to c/techtakes@awful.systems

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

of course he was afraid of russian nuukes. this only prompted Ukrainian engineers to bypass use of starlink entirely and current sea drones, like the one used in second Kerch bridge strike, or these used against SIG tanker and Olenegorsky Gornyak landing ship use domestic technology only

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

[–] markvonwahlde@mastodon.world -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

@downpunxx LOL. That would be Musk's wildest dream. The just compensation he would get would be astounding. Better to tax his space stuff...enough so that we could afford the regulatory apparatus sufficient to protect ourselves from it......

[–] jonhendry@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's a SCOTUS case that says the government only has to pay a fair market value, not the "inflated by the government's need for the property" value. In the case a guy had bought a tugboat and fixed it up quite a bit. When WW2 started the government sought to buy it, and he insisted on a price well above the cost of the boat and the improvements, arguing that WW2 had increased demand so he should get a higher price.

So Musk would get a lot, but maybe not as much you'd think.

[–] markvonwahlde@mastodon.world -1 points 1 year ago

@jonhendry Yeah...but such a trial may require a jury, and that uncertainty very often ups the market value considerably above FMV. It would be stupid to nationalize, given the property is not unique (like real property), presents no barrier to entry. Besides, regulation and taxation are available.

[–] markvonwahlde@mastodon.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@jonhendry Another huge reason why nationalization would be really stupid. Starlink's value can be dichotomized into two categories: (1) Business activity that conflicts with US foreign policy, and (2) Business activity that doesn't conflict with US foreign policy. I suspect the latter value vastly exceeds the former value. In a condemnation proceeding, the US would have to buy the whole kit and kaboodle--what a waste. Then...managing Starlink's business as a federal entity (wtf?)....

[–] self@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

it’s weird that the only thing you’ve posted in this thread is links to wav files of the sound of guillotine blades cutting through the air

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)