Asklemmy

43908 readers

1445 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If it took you X hours to get somewhere, for how many hours would it feel worth it to stay at bare minimum? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Would you want to stay for at least X hours? 2X? 4X? Something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

X/2+7 is like the 80-20 rule: it fits 80% of the time.

Given a travel time of X, half that time plus 7 more hours seems reasonable, until it isn't. 1 hour? Full day. 2 hours? Also a full day. 8 hours? Now were talking 2 days with an overnight expense and 80% per diem.

Math. It works.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that also the equation for finding your youngest possible date? I'm 27 and according to that my lower limit is 20.5.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's like the 80-20 rule, I say!

load more comments (1 replies)