this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
71 points (97.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8910 readers
861 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

NOW only it's finished? When did it become normal for these companies to release half finished trash and use their paying customers as beta testers?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Not too long after Minecraft blew up and they saw that people would willingly pay to play shit that's not finished.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's one game that I never got into the hype train with and still haven't got around to trying, even though it looks like it's right up my alley. So I might be mistaken but wasn't Minecraft originally an indie effort? I don't like it but I can understand and appreciate giving indie devs support while they're still working on things a lot more than paying the mega corporation for the privilege of being a beta tester.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, it was an indie thing, but it was also one of the first huge success stories from crowdfunding/early access, too. So in typical game's industry fashion, they copied it; but only the parts that make them more money for less effort.

load more comments (1 replies)