this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
319 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12543 readers
1459 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to police, Charles Smith, 27, entered the Walmart at 1955 S. Stapley Dr. on Dec. 19 intending to film pranks for social media platforms.

Instead, police said Smith grabbed a can of Hot Shot Ultra Bed Bug and Flea Killer from a shelf without paying for it and then sprayed the pesticide on various vegetables, fruit and rotisserie chickens that were available for purchase.

Smith recorded his face, the pesticide can and the act of him spraying its contents. He later posted the recording online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago (17 children)

It's been publicallly stated neither him nor his parents were customers of that specific insurance company, so the manifesto is likely fake.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (15 children)

The “We have no indication that he was ever a client of United Healthcare…” (https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/12/13/us/ceo-shooting-luigi-mangione-unitedhealthcare) is a little far away from a definitive statement, isn’t it? If they knew that not to be the case, why wouldn’t they say it so? Its really shouldn’t be hard to find out

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (14 children)

So... do you think he was a customer, and they just haven't found out yet?

Like you said, it shouldn't be hard to find out. Therefore, he almost certainly wasn't a customer. They'd know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

So… why aren’t they saying that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

United already has a serious public image problem with their 30%-35% claim denial rate.

How much worse would it be if they said, "yeah, Luigi's back problems could have been easily fixed by surgery, but we decided to deny that claim and put him on painkillers for the rest of his life." They'd be admitting that one of their many fark-ups got their CEO killed. And that's not going to help their case if this ever goes to trial.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I am not an american so I wouldn’t know, but surely your police force wouldn’t lie in the interest of a company, would it?

Or like, there would be massive legal backlash if the company disclosed false info to the police, no?

What is going on over the great puddle?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

police force wouldn’t lie

Absolutely corruptible. That lie wouldn't even be expensive. Company puts in a call to execs running the police, they say how they want it to go down, make promises for money/power/favor, trickles down through the ranks.

massive legal backlash if the company disclosed false info

The feds didn't even pay the reward and there was no backlash. We don't get together well and protest over things that don't affect us individually. Even the left is shit at it. We expect them to lie. If someone produces proof he was with them, they'll just plain plausible deniability or individual incompetence.

Corporations own our political landscape on both sides. The judges, the police, everyone is running with a level of autonomy, wiggle room as you will, but when they need a narrative fed, it's easy. Only 60% of us even believe the truth, feeding a few lies is simple.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

That's just how cops talk. Police are trained to speak as vaguely as possible in order to not give the defense any ammunition. If they say "he was not a customer" then the defense can use that in the trial, and why would they want to help the defense?

Now answer my question. Do you think he was a customer, and they just haven’t found out yet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How on the bloody earth would assassinating his character help his defense? Maybe if they were lying, that could help I guess?

He is either ought to be, or he is a set up! It is very suspicious that after a week of headless panicking they found the suspect with the murder weapon and an apparently false paper explaining that he did it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

The most likely explanation for that is he's not the criminal mastermind you want him to be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude you're thinking way too deeply into, it really is as simple as "that's just how cops and lawyers talk, nobody is going to give away anything."

On top of that we have pretty serious restrictions called HIPAA on releasing private healthcare information and no insurance provider in the world is just going to go ahead and confirm plans details or lack of one if they don't have to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So you think the police shared a semi-guess on the conference?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What was their guess? Their statement was a non-answer at best.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I can copy in the same quote from a few comments above? “We have no indication that he was ever the client of United Healthcare…” (https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/us/ceo-shooting-luigi-mangione-unitedhealthcare/index.html)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I'm not sure what you think that statement means.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)