this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
344 points (77.7% liked)

Memes

45874 readers
1420 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 22 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

The short term effect of voting for the "greater evil" (or not voting at all): straight to the far, far right.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

The time to vote for someone good is the primaries, which set what the dichotomy of the actual election is going to be like. In the November dichotomy, voting for the lesser evil is kinda the only option unless you want Big Evil to win.

Yes, it would be better to "merge" the main election and primaries into a ranked-choice vote but that's not happening anytime soon.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The time to vote for someone good is the primaries

"The time to vote against evil is in the bullshit private competition that the party can and does rig, ignore, or not bother with at all."

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, which is why voting is not enough: you have to campaign for the candidates you want to see. The ranked-choice system would fix this but that's off-limits for now.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

How does "campaigning" for the candidates you want to see make a difference if you're not going to vote for them?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say voting is pointless. You should go vote too. But if I go vote in the US I'll be arrested.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)