this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
321 points (95.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5698 readers
1225 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
321
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

Ok, here me out… wait wait just listen. This absolutely violates every Osha regulation in the book, no body is arguing that, but what I am about to argue is this is actually pretty safe.

  1. Those sparks cool through the air fast enough that they won’t burn skin let alone solid steel.
  2. any melted metal is under the tanks so it will drop safely to the ground.
  3. If any melted metal did land on the tank it would not be enough to melt through. It would simply solidify and leave a clump of metal.
  4. even if he aimed the torch directly at the tank it would still take 3-5 Minutes to burn through way more than enough time to realize what he is doing.
  5. even if he did somehow Pierce the tank they would not explode they don’t have oxygen in them they would only burn a small torch like flame out the hole you put in it.
  6. if one of them for some reason exploded(once again not going to happen) it would not set up a chain reaction, these tanks are made like….Tanks they will not explode from so little force.
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How about... the tanks could be empty?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Once they have been filled once they are never truly empty.

Even then, it's much safer to assume they are full than gambling on them being empty. Dangerous goods transport regulations don't differentiate for a reason

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

If they're brand new that would be fine, if they have been used, it may be even more dangerous because they're full of trace fumes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Whoa that's way too simple.

load more comments (14 replies)