this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)
Economics
444 readers
80 users here now
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article is missing why they rejected the 35% over 4 years. What do they actually want? Do they want 35% now? I'd also be interested to know how much money they are willing to lose if the strike costs Boeing 100M per day. Are the wages being asked significantly more than that? If they could raise 35% right now and it were to cost them 100M, then putting offers on the table that are likely to fail and losing 100M/day is just idiotic.
Just adding on: they used to have pensions up until 10 years ago when Boeing pulled them
From current and past Boeing employees I've spoken to, the pension was basically stolen from them with a slimy holiday vote. They don't want the 401k with zero matching, they want their pensions back and that's the line in the sand. Boeing is using their media clout and holding production jobs in Seattle and Everett hostage to scare people into taking the deal for another 7 years till the next vote. Moving jobs to SC where union enrollment is less or non-existent is the goal.