this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
80 points (96.5% liked)

Open Source

31180 readers
168 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Oh man I see so much criticism of F-Droid's policies incoming...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there anything controversial about them?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There are those who believe that F-Droid's role as a "middle man" vetting and building packages from source instead of blindly shipping builds provided by upstream makes it a security risk, because you're trusting F-Droid in addition to (some say instead of) the upstream developer. Perhaps telling is that none of these critics can offer an alternative solution.

Before anyone mentions Obtainium and Accrescent, these are not alternatives to F-Droid, they solve completely different problems.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It would be a single point of failure for many apps in case the curators of F-Droid were dishonest or hacked. They could insert bad things into lots of packages without having to change the public source code. But it also becomes the only point where malware or backdoors could be inserted that way, instead of having to trust every single developer to build honestly off the source code, which we'd have to do if they just stuck prebuilt binaries up there. I don't know how rational I'm being, but it makes me trust F-Droid apps more that they build each one themselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

also worth pointing out that fdroid supports reproducible builds, which helps quite a bit with being trustable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I personally like F-Droid's vetting process. It's true that updates always arrive a few days later, but you can be sure they don't contain any malicious code. Furthermore, they specify all of the antifeatures a program has, which makes it easier to avoid them. If you want faster updates, you can always download a program through Obtanium.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I am not an F-Droid maintainer, but as far as I know the code is not vetted by F-Droid after the initial app submission process. Updates are pulled in, built and distributed automatically. The long delay is just because there are a lot of apps to build, and F-Droid is a volunteer-run operation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I had no idea. Thanks for telling me! In that case, im going to try to use the ones from IzzyOnDroid if avaliable

Edit: According to their docs, they do take some special security measures and I couldn't find a case of an app offered on FDroid which had malware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For those who don't like them, yes.

load more comments (5 replies)