this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
528 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58810 readers
4450 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 weeks ago (51 children)

There's just no good reason to have anything beyond the radio/nav etc in a car connected to the Internet. Remote start can be done with just the key.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (22 children)

I mean, there are plenty of very good reasons.

My car reminds me if the doors are unlocked or left open. I can adjust the charging speed at any time. I can turn on the HVAC and seat heaters before I leave. I can see my current state of charge. I can see exactly what is happening when my alarm goes off. I can see exactly where it is if it's stolen. Etc.

You can argue that those are not important to you, personally but I don't think you can argue that they aren't good reasons.

I think there are certainly other wireless technologies that are superior in many ways and can supplement or replace the need for internet access in your immediate area.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the point is that there isn't a good enough reason to put internet in a car that negates the risk of it.

It is like adding lead to food. It's a cheap sweetener with no calories. You can argue that cheap sweeteners aren't important to you, but I don't think you can argue that it isn't a good reason. It just isn't a good enough reason to negate the risk.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the point is that there isn't a good enough reason

OK but that's not what they said.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

if its not a good enough reason, that's literally not a good reason

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"Not good enough" = not important to you

"no good reason" = the benefits dont exist.

These are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Not good enough" = not important to you

you have misunderstood something.

not good enough means the downsides highly, severely outweigh the upsides. It's not that "I wouldn't use it and then you shouldn't have it either", it's that there are very good reasons to not have these in my car, or anyone's really, in a way where they cannot be removed!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

it's that there are very good reasons to not have these in my car

There's also very good reason TO have them, as I've already explained.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)