this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
36 points (95.0% liked)
World Politics
371 readers
1 users here now
A community for discussion of world politics (including the U.S.)
Rules:
-
No hate speech or bigotry of any kind.
-
No spam or deliberate misinformation.
-
Links to news articles should use the headline as the title whenever appropriate.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How is directly targeting Hezbollah indiscriminate? It's literally the opposite. It would be indiscriminate if they prepared general pagers / whatever that may or may not be used by Hezbollah, but also countless other people. But as far as we can tell the collateral damage was comparatively low, since they targeted shipments directly meant for Hezbollah itself, meaning this was a highly efficient strike.
I so looking into it. It looks like few of the pagers are given to actual militants. They were given out to any who they needed to be in contact to, which includes civilians. I can’t get any percentages or counts other than 12 dead and 2700 injured. But the fact that the US indicates that Isreal made the bombs, and even they can’t give any estimate how effective it was… yes it was a war crime akin to disguising a bomb as a harmless object. Your claim that this was a “targeted strike” Is an assumption unfounded by any evidence.
If you're sympathizing or even in direct contact & planning with a terrorist organization, then you're part of the terrorists, and with that, a target. You're just one of the many unthinking "Israel bad" people here. There's much to criticize about Israel, this ain't it. Unless you're a Hezbollah sympathizer of course, in which case, see my first sentence.
And no, the US being unable to gauge the effectiveness does not indicate a war crime. That's just ridiculous mental gymnastics, which don't even make the slightest bit of sense.
And the two dead kids?