this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
329 points (98.5% liked)

Games

16700 readers
1115 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
329
EA execs say generative AI is "not merely a buzzword for us, it's the very core of our business," then pretend to tell a computer to generate buildings live on stage (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That's how I look at AI. It will never (in it's current forms) replace people, but it can turn a passionate creator into a one person army

Using AI is a form of programming - you turn the right words into action. Programming is magic, an AI user is a warlock

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

As a programmer I can tell you that AI is nothing like programming because programming is deterministic and repeatable and AI is anything but.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AI is actually deterministic, a random input is usually included to let you get multiple outputs for generative tasks. And anyway, you could just save the "random" output when you get a good one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe deterministic wasn't quite the correct word but basically it only gives you a result that resembles your previous result if you change absolutely nothing, not the training data for the model, not the model, not the random seed, not the prompt,... which makes it useless for iteratively approaching a usable result. I guess the output space is not contiguous might be a better way to describe it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Right, technically deterministic, but not practically

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)