this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
612 points (84.6% liked)

US Authoritarianism

797 readers
72 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (11 children)

all-white jury

Since he admits he was guilty under the terms of the law I don't see how this is possibly relevant. Are we knowing he is guilty supposed to think they were biased for finding him guilty?

LaKeith was non-violent

Breaking into homes with a gun to shoot the home owner if things get dicey isn't non-violent. Invading people's home is inherently violent

offered him a plea deal of “only” 25 years.

Which would have seen him potentially out in 20 a man of 35

LaKeith, being a child with a life ahead of him, declined the plea deal and exercised his constitutional right to a trial.

It is absolutely his right but it was also fucking stupid.

It is likely that if LaKeith had been tried as a juvenile and/or tried appropriately for the burglary, he would be free today.

Are we assuming this is a good thing. He broke into a home with a gunman ready to murder the occupant. What sort of man is he now?

load more comments (8 replies)