Out of respect for Japanese "omotenashi", I won't call it greed... I do think most Japanese people would want to maintain a fair and equal pricing structure for all customers. In a better world, if the economy was booming and people were prospering, there might still be some establishments looking to earn more by fleecing and overcharging tourists. It's fine to call that greed, or taking advantage of demand inelasticity, or whatever.
But... here we are. Times are hard, I get it. Even with overcharging under a dual-pricing structure, tourists will probably continue to visit Japan if they can afford it. It's just a shame that the Japanese will probably have to compromise on some aspects of their omotenashi because of greater factors beyond their control.
Maybe by having a dual pricing structure, they'd be able to realize maximum profits. But not everything is calculable in dollars and cents... all you'd need are a few establishments to start vastly overcharging tourists for whatever cooked up reason and the reputation of Japan for tourists might soon become "nice scenery, nice culture, but the people there will overcharge you because they think they can exploit your ignorance, or just because they can..." - neither of which paints the Japanese in the best light, or the way they'd want to be seen, probably.
Source: Japan Today article
The people going to Japan have cash to spare, they'll gladly pay extra and they won't even notice it.
Or they're going because now is a prime opportunity to visit on a budget. A tourist tax could mean some visitors staying for less time or deciding to visit somewhere else.
Good. Fuck tourism.
Do you really believe people shouldn't be traveling abroad? Why is that? Do you believe everyone should stay home instead?
Tourism is a cancer. There isn't a single place on earth that was improved by tourism.
There are many places on earth that exist largely because of tourism. And encouraging people to go experience cultures outside their own is a good thing.
Places that only exist because of tourism shouldn't exist in the first place.
Grand canyon. Most national parks.
If these things were not available to the public, then they would not be considered usable, and would therefore be exploited into nonexistence to make them usable.
Can't wait to go on my next hike to find what kind of trash tourists left for the next guys to find.
I'm not saying tourism is the best solution, but unless you are hiking to the middle of nowhere or a city, there's a decent chance tourism is a part of the reason you can enjoy that hike at all
I don't need a tourism industry to grab my gear and hike the protected domanial forest behind my house.