this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
174 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48074 readers
792 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Serious question: why would anyone opt for XFS these days? I remember reading about it being faster/more efficient with small files, but is that still valid?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

XFS is rock solid and still has active development going on, so why not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rock solid may be a stretch. They still suffer from outrageous metadata bugs even to this day when used in busy file systems.

That bug alone has been open for over a decade. Development focus of the people who understand and want to fix those things have shifted to other filesystems like ext4 and ZFS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Main reason I stopped using it ten years ago.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But are there benefits over ext4 and BTRFS these days?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the top of my head, compared to ext4: RAM use and the ability to shrink an FS if necessary. Oh, also I've used an EXT FS driver on a Windows host, but I've never seen one for XFS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, the previous comment asked about benefits of XFS over ext4. But I completely agree with your reasons for choosing ext4.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, my bad.

The two benefits to XFS that I've ever seen are that it has no inode limit like ext4 (which prevents the FS shrink). The other is that it seems to handle simultaneous I/O better than ext4 does; think very active database volumes and datastores.

load more comments (23 replies)