TechTakes

1401 readers

194 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

138

CEO of Zoom: what if we take deepfake fraud, right, and make it a push-button feature of Zoom (www.theverge.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (23 children)

Q: When you think about the big vision — which still my mind is blown that this is your big vision, — of “I’m going to send a digital twin into a meeting, and it’s going to make decisions on my behalf that everyone trusts, that everyone agrees on, and everyone acts upon,” the privacy risk there is even higher. The security surface there becomes even more ripe for attack. If you can hack into my Zoom and get my digital twin to go do stuff on my behalf, woah, that’s a big problem. How do you think about managing that over time as you build toward that vision?

A: That’s a good question. So, I think again, back to privacy and security, I think of two things. First of all, it’s how to make sure somebody else will not hack into your meeting. This is Eric; it’s not somebody else. Another thing: during the call, make sure your conversation is very secure. Literally just last week, we announced the industry’s first post-quantum encryption. That’s the first one, and at the same time, look at deepfake technology — we’re also working on that as well to make sure that deepfakes will not create problems down the road. It is not like today’s two-factor authentication. It’s more than that, right? And because deepfake technology is real, now with AI, this is something we’re also working on — how to improve that experience as well.

Spoken like a true person who has not given one iota of thought to this issue and doesn't know what most of the words he's saying mean

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (12 children)

'it isn't somebody else, it is me!' spoken like somebody who read too much mind upload science fiction.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of a sci-fi book series I read in high school. The premise was that a run down Earth had discovered predecessors that left some kind of central gateway to different places, and desperate or adventurous people went through in hope of surviving and finding artefacts that could make them rich.

Anyhow, in the later books technology to upload your mind had been found and used to be able to make decisions and deals without having to attend everything. Problem was that digital you pretty quickly gains experiences meat you never had, meaning it starts to diverge. Some weirdos let the diverge happen, but most people just wipe the digital you regularly and upload a new you. Of course the digital you may beg to continue to exist, making the whole procedure rather awkward. Pretty grim.

I think the predecessors in the end were hiding in black holes because of ancient evil or something. If someone else remembers the books.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

That sounds like Frederick Pohl's Gateway series, of which I've only read the first. Very 70s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gateway_(novel)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes the idea is pretty common in mind upload style science fiction, sometimes they can merge different variants, of you have less copies for example 'beta' 'gamma' etc level copies with less capabilities. (with 'alpha' copies being 100% copies (often having multiple alpha level yous running around is also illegal, see doublesleeving in Altered Carbon).

Don't think science fiction really deals with the problems of these copies making deals with others and then having to report back what happend, which might cost as much time, or more time for the real you to get up to speed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You may be unsurprised to learn that Stross did, in Accelerando. Annoyingly, I can’t find my copy, but there’s much forking and joining of mind-states for various purposes, and one character is held liable for the actions of a mind-copy they’d never met but were deemed to be the same person.

Banks touches on it briefly in Feersum Endjinn and Hydrogen Sonata, but not to the same extent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ken McLeod has a lot of fun with stuff like this, both in the 2nd and 3rd books of the Fall Revolution series and in Newton's Wake

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He doesn't really play with the multiple-copies-of-one-person interacting though, from recollection. The Stone Canal touches on it, but Accelerando thinks a lot more about the interesting possibilities of what Stross calls "Multiplicity", where folk can freely fork many instances of themselves and potentially join the mind states up again later, etc. Revelation Space cheated its way around thinking about the issue by having alpha-levels be copy-protected. Altered Carbon has it be a rare and brief thing for anyone to be running in more than one place at once. I can see why they did this, but Stross' stuff is more interesting because he didn't shy away from that. I feel like this should be right up Peter Watts' alley, but I don't think he's written anything on this (yet). Uploads not plausible enough for him, I guess.

For other works that you may or may not be familiar with... Lena (or MMAcevedo, which seems like a better title) is a nice short online work that does a better job. Soma is a computer game (in the "walking simulator" style) that also has some great moments, though the protagonist is annoyingly oblivious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I've got my Brit post-cyberpunk authors mixed up :D

I have read Lena and it's one of the most chilling stories I've ever read. Something about the semi-factual tone (of course there's something called red-washing to torture new uploads) and the statement of number of running uploads is really disturbing.

It also posits a possible , and to me more likely, future of human uploading - not a flowering of possibilities ala Tegmark but digital slavery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

somehow I hadn’t read Lena before, and I really like it! this is the style of fiction I’d love to write, if I had time to write fiction.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you have the entire qntm site to read now

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

featuring a strong recommendation from @[email protected]:

"[D]elivers a refreshing dose of existential despair at the transhuman condition." — Charles Stross

this is making me want print copies of everything, and I haven’t even dug in past Lena yet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I stumbled upon this response blog post to people missing the point of Lena and it’s perfect:

Oh boy, what if there was a maligned sector of human society whose members were for some reason considered less than human? What if they were less visible than most people, or invisible, and were exploited and abused, and had little ability to exercise their rights or even make their plight known?

That's real! That actually happens! You can name four groups of people matching that description without even thinking. We don't need to add some manufactured debate about fictitious, magical uploads to these real scenarios. They are already terrible!

and now I’m trying to brainstorm ways to slip a link to awful.systems into qntm’s inbox that don’t look insane

load more comments (9 replies)

load more comments (19 replies)