this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
603 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

34907 readers
274 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Look, nothing will blow up if I mess up my proxy setup on my machine. I just won't have internet until I revert my change. Why would that be different if I were getting paid for it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Setting up proxy is not engineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have to actually modify the code to properly package it for my distro, so it's engineering because I have to make decisions for how things work

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how this supports your point then. If "setting up proxy" means "packaging it to run on thousands user machines" then isn't there obvious and huge potential for a disastrous fuckup?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

No, because it either runs the program successfully, or it fails to launch. I don't mess with the protocol. It runs as root because it needs to set the iptables when turned on to be a "global" proxy

load more comments (4 replies)