this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
3 points (57.1% liked)
Linux
5232 readers
123 users here now
A community for everything relating to the linux operating system
Also check out [email protected]
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't have an answer as to what happened, I checked the script and it looks sane to me, it installs the
docker-cepackage which should be the open-source community version as one would expect.Maybe check what the package depends on and see if it pulls in all of that. Even qemu is a bit weird, it makes sense for docker-machine but I expect that to be a different package anyway. I guess Docker Desktop probably does use it, that way they can make it work the same on all platforms which is kind of dumb to do on Linux.
But,
Try out Podman. It's mostly a drop-in replacement for Docker, daemonless, rootless and less magical.
Podman, gotcha. I am freaking tired of these Docker-esque companies. They use their status as a FOSS application to grift people. As if it's really 'hard' to do what Docker does! It's just mixing a namespaces(7) with cgroups(7), some other stuff too, like seccomp(7). Hashicorp is one of these companies, I think you know, it went entirely closed-source a few months ago. But truly, what is so 'complex' about a secure hashtable database? GNU has one! You can use libcrypto + libtokyocabinet to make one in matter of hours. I think the issue is, most sysadmins, especially old ones, are either clueless about systems programming, or if they are, they are just too lazy to roll their own. I'm not saying 'roll your own', I'm saying, you don't necessarily need super-stable software. Companies like Hashicorp and Docker find giant customers with rich pockets, e.g. AWS, either that, or some degenerate Black-Rock-esque corporate buys them out and you know, I don't wanna prescribe anything to Americans because I don't wanna be the pot calling the kettle black, but damn, imprison those damn investment bankers! They don't understand that closed source doesn't necessarily mean 'more moola'. What it means is more obscurity, more trouble finding bugs, etc. The closed-source software died fucking ages ago. Even Micrsoft open-sourced DOS, most likely they will start open-sourcing 9x and then NT, or at least, release Windows' specs; pretty soon. Say whatever about micropeni$ but they produce more FOSS these days than closed-source software! E.g. VSCode, Terminal, TypeScript, etc (I don't use any of them, but I appreciate the gesture!).
Sorry for the rant.
@Max_P is right: try podman. It also can run rootless, no docker service running in the background, either.
If you have the time and spare credits (and the cash to pay for tuition, of course) I'd recommend a basic humanities course or two. An intro to English literature is usually straightforward and easy. World history is great; history of the 20th century is also great, for different reasons. Personally, I recommend some sort of into to philosophy or epistemology; another mind-opening one is intro to anthropology or comparative values & beliefs. Ask your course counselor about this.
In general, if possible, I would recommend that you consider what it might be like to have a bachelor of arts instead of a bachelor of sciences. If your school offers it, it would be a much more balanced degree.
I'm not American though :D
Ah, no worries. There should be an introduction-to-literature course in your native language, covering the classics and important works of your native culture. I still stand by the rest of the recommendations. By "bachelor of arts" and "bachelor of sciences" I mean how your college/university accredits degrees; computer science and engineering are usually "science" degrees but many universities have an alternative "art" version that you can choose.