Movies and TV Shows

2114 readers

38 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

Be civil.
Please do not link to pirated content.
No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Jack O’Connell Joins ‘28 Years Later’ Trilogy From Sony And Danny Boyle (deadline.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (6 children)

It's a trilogy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Have you not seen 28 days later or 28 weeks later? They’re pretty solid

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have, but that's not what they mean. 28 years later will be its own trilogy apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That doesn’t sound logical lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's basically what the linked article says, the first two paragraphs:

EXCLUSIVE: After landing the villain role in Ryan Coogler‘s next project, Jack O’Connell continues to fill out his dance card. Sources tell Deadline that he is set to join the cast of 28 Years Later, a sequel to 2002’s 28 Days Later. Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Ralph Fiennes also star in the pic, which is part of a planned trilogy.

Danny Boyle is directing the first movie from a script by Alex Garland. Sony will release the film in theaters globally.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I’m not arguing. I just think it’s kinda crazy lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Not trying to argue, sorry if it came across hostile. Just pointing out that the confusing title actually means what it implies.

load more comments (4 replies)