this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
78 points (92.4% liked)

Linux

5165 readers
196 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 months ago (28 children)

This will probably lead to vocal outrage because it's Systemd rather than an alternative project coming up with the solution.

Sudo has long known to have dangerous weaknesses, but it's generally been accepted since sudo solves a bunch of other problems. If we can fix the problems sudo has, then that's a good thing. Would be nicer if we could split up some of these projects though to stop uber projects.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (10 children)

mesa and linux is also "uber projects" i think in certains canes you can't run away from them, systemd is the same, but for privilegiated processes that need to be well integrated for security reasons

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (9 children)

While I agree that sometimes Uber projects happen, for efficiency or security reasons, I don't think that Mesa is a good example as they have a scope (implement the OpenGL/Vulkan API) and stick to it.

Systemd is already confusing because of it referencing two different projects, and the overarching systemd projects scope just increases on a regular basis without what appears to external observers as a plan.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is journald still binary? That alone made me turn away. I am using PCLinuxOS hence am systemd free. Stopped reading up on it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is journald still binary? That alone made me turn away.

Yes, unreadable with a text editor. Meaning that if you have a computer problem and journald or systemd is broken you have can't consult the log files, unless you did install rsyslog or sometimes before that. Meanwhile by default journald will eat a few GBs of disk space soon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Compared to this what is the advantage of binary form? I thought log files being text was a no brainer.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Storage efficiency, faster queries, more metadata, unified format, etc. If your host breaks, you can download the journals and open then elsewhere. Also, there is nothing stopping you from configuring it to output to a file.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Open them elsewhere is also true for text files I guess.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"on nooo i'm gonna stop using what make modern linux OS good just because they save logs in binary, istead of binary w ith .txt 😭😭" go ahead them, make your life worse

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

“on nooo i’m gonna stop using what make modern linux OS good just because they save logs in binary, istead of binary w ith .txt 😭😭” go ahead them, make your life worse

😒

One can keep on using systemd and complain about journald and install rsyslogd and then you'd have the journalctl -f command to impress your Linux noob friends ;-) and /var/log/syslog when there's trouble when journald would be dead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

if you can't access journald you have a bigger problem than crying about it's binary file format, but ok keep needing to parse every fucking log using grep and taking 30 second to find anything meaningful if you hate yourself that much

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)