this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
286 points (84.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21057 readers
377 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 68 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    I thought Arch was the only rolling distro that doesn't have the backdoor. Its sshd is not linked with liblzma, and even if it were, they compile xz directly from git so they wouldn't have gotten the backdoor anyway.

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    liblzma is the problem. sshd is just the first thing they found that it is attacking. liblzma is used by firefox and many other critical packages.

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Arch does not directly link openssh to liblzma, and thus this attack vector is not possible. You can confirm this by issuing the following command:

    ldd "$(command -v sshd)"
    
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

    Yes, this sshd attack vector isn't possible. However, they haven't decomposed the exploit and we don't know the extent of the attack. The reporter of the issue just scratched the surface. If you are using Arch, you should run pacman right now to downgrade.

    [–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago

    They actually have an upgrade fix for it, at least for the known parts of it. Doing a standard system upgrade will replace the xz package with one with the known backdoor removed.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

    I switched it with 5.4, just in case.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

    Bold of you to assume I hare upgraded in the first place.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

    If you are using Arch, you should run pacman right now to downgrade.

    No, just update. It's already fixed. Thats the point of rolling release.

    load more comments (2 replies)