this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22524 readers
56 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

  5. Posts about mental health should go in [email protected] you are loved here :meow-hug: but !mentalhealth is much better equipped to help you out <3.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supposing I'm Fred The Fed and I want to shut down Hexbear.net

What if I try to make a case that admins tolerate sharing copyrighted material in violation of Statute XYZ, so the site is illegal and should be seized.

You might say, "Copyright laws are dumb, man! Who cares!" but that doesn't matter. Tell that to the law.

Should we get a lawyer's advice on this? What steps does the site need to take to avoid heat?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It's not worth thinking about. If the feds or anyone else wants to shut Hexbear down, they will find an excuse. Or they won't and they'll do it anyway. The feds don't need a reason to shut down something like Hexbear and no amount of hand wringing will stop it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about wringing hands (why would ya expect that to work?); I'm talking about getting advice on legal compliance

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

And I'm telling you that would be meaningless. You don't have to break the law for the feds to shut you down. Even if you're legally in the right you'd still have to go to court over it, you'd still have legal fees, and you'd still lose even assuming you could afford it. "The Law" only applies to folks who can afford the law and even then only if the government decides to let it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Absolute defeatism doesn't seem like a great strategy

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Defeatism is when you acknowledge that The Law serves the interest of capital rather than the interest of the people, apparently?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's joever (on mobile so imagine a giving up emoji of your choice)

load more comments (3 replies)