this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

9068 readers
61 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I think the safe bet is not that Ferrari suddenly can compete for wins now, but rather that RBR underperformed here due to a combination of factors.

First of all, lacking data from what Max would have done blurs the picture a lot. Second, RBR did a rare strategy blunder with Checo and had him try to protect his front tires too much in his first stint, which did not pay off at all and in fact backfired completely. It also sounds like they didn't get the setup right, which wouldn't have helped.

Lastly, Australia is notorious for teams suddenly performing much better or worse there out of nowhere, and for performance at Melbourne not being representative for performance anywhere else on the calendar. It's very possible Albert Park was a circuit that happened to suit Ferrari and not suit RBR at the same time.

It looks like just the perfect storm really, and I assume it's business as usual in Suzuka. Please let me be wrong, though!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the deep explanation!

load more comments (3 replies)