this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
346 points (95.1% liked)

World News

32322 readers
818 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And the IEA, for its part, expects China to continue to be the sole meaningful over-achiever. It recently revised upwards by 728 GW its forecast for total global renewables capacity additions in the period 2023–27. China’s share of this upward revision? Almost 90 percent. While China surges ahead, the rest of the world remains stuck.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

"Trying" isn't really a thing on a national scale. What countries do and how they react just depends on their economic system / mode of production.

Capitalist countries, on account of being capitalist, can never really tackle climate change. China's the only major country taking this seriously because a socialist nation doesn't need the profit motive that's required under capitalism.

As with most things, the answer is revolution.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Let's not call China socialist when a single party dictates larger economic trends in an otherwise competitive global market. It's just not "free" as in free market capitalism.

Otherwise I completely agree with the weaknesses of the western capitalist systems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't think you understand socialism tbh

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Enlighten me then. Means of production doesn't seem to be controled by the party alone. Most of China's economy still follows capitalist principles. Rich Chinese and owners of businesses are still private citizens. Sure, some influenced by the government, some industries very heavily regulated, but China still follows capitalist principles in most cases.

I always thought Socialism means that means of production is controlled by labor directly, not capital owners or an elists single-party government.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago

Just like how capitalism is a spectrum (in that, y'know, the US does not have purely free market capitalism but is still widely considered a capitalist state), socialism is also a spectrum. Marx and Engel's writings do touch on this, but it was expanded on by the works of Lenin and Deng Xiaoping (among others). If you're actually willing to learn, I'd recommend asking on hexbear.net because they're much more familiar with the literature than me.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)