this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
5 points (63.2% liked)

Programming

17313 readers
84 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

I'm looking something (a website ?) to quickly share code.

That have the following attribute

  • not especially need to register !
  • syntax highlight for a various languages (especially ๐Ÿ Python )
  • users can upload modified version of the code
  • Can show the difference between versions (modified, added, removed ) with color and nice interface.
  • Something that respect as much the gnu philosophy (so nothing like Github etc..)

Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34011581#:~:text=Background%20story%20seems%20to%20be,own%20community%20as%20a%20consequence.

TLDR; if, as OP mentioned as a desirable criterion:

Something that respect as much the gnu philosophy (so nothing like Github etc..)

Gitea might not specifically be the best self hosted GitHub clone to use.

I use it. I self host it. But if you're prioritizing FOSS philosophies, there are other GitHub clones that would fit the bill.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Thank you very much @[email protected] , any names for GitHub alternatives ?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)