The original post: /r/ufos by /u/efh1 on 2024-12-31 23:48:53.
The Ecosystemic Futures podcast had an episode titled, "Beyond Paradigms: Ultra-Advanced Technologies, Anomalous Phenomena, and the Future of Innovation" in which Puthoff and Graves are both guests. They give a great discussion on advanced physics and UAP, but the real bombshell is dropped at the 6:43 mark by one of the co-hosts, Larry Forsley, who states,
"Last November 3rd, there was a meeting held at the Senate by the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees looking at 3 topics: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions or Lattice Confinement Fusion, extended electrodynamics, which is basically taking what we all love with Maxwell's equations and then correcting some pieces that seem to have been left out and then last, the role of UAP's. And the consideration for the meeting was that the power source that UAP use may very well be something like lattice confinement fusion and that the potential electro-gravitics as applied to propulsion - how they get around - so there is an overlap there. Subsequent to that meeting we had another one on December 8th and we submitted a proposal to explore this between NASA and the US Navy."
If you want to learn more about LENR and EED, I posted an analysis of a later episode also featuring Puthoff and Forsley in which this topic is elaborated on in much more detail. As for the meeting he claims was held, I couldn't find anything on it with a quick search. I assume he's referring to the year 2024, but then I see that this podcast episode was published on Nov. 12th so I'm a little confused. Maybe he meant Nov. 8th and not Dec. 8th? If so, this meeting took place roughly 2 weeks before the public AARO meeting and this podcast was published 1 week before the public AARO meeting.
In this episode Ryan Graves goes into a lot more detail about what he and other pilots have witnessed than I've heard in the past. He explains how they display that they must have some kind of energy source that we don't have. He also explains how they verified it was not a software glitch as they first assumed and that whatever they are he would describe them as operational technology rather than something experimental. He details how the military would routinely encounter these and mostly ignore them.
Graves and Travis Taylor both discuss how interdisciplinary groups are the only way to understand UAP because no one person can know enough to fully grasp the advanced nature of the topic. Puthoff pushes for advocating that anything is possible in order for us to generate great leaps in our understanding. The general theme of the discussion is to figure out how to commercialize advanced physics and there seems to be a concern that if we don't do it, someone else will.
By the way, I also proposed something very similar to what was submitted to NASA and the US Navy here on r/ufos over the past 2-3 years. I got a lot of push back at first but basically refused to shut up about it. I know this post won't get thousands of upvotes because it's not a video of blurry light or discussing NHI directly or complaining about the government or some UFO personality in pop culture. This is a discussion about advanced physics and technology.