Cryptocurrency News & Discussion

6 readers
1 users here now

The leading community for cryptocurrency news, discussion, and analysis.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
901
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Abdeliq on 2024-12-08 04:24:02.
902
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Archipelag0h on 2024-12-08 03:47:05.
903
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/WineMakerBg on 2024-12-08 03:43:49.

The Czech Republic recently made headlines when its Parliament overwhelmingly voted to exempt capital gains from Bitcoin and other crypto-asset sales from personal income tax—provided they’re held for more than three years and meet certain income thresholds. This is not an isolated event. Countries like Switzerland, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, El Salvador, Hong Kong, and parts of the Caribbean have long recognized that zero or minimal capital gains taxation on Bitcoin can help spur adoption, financial innovation, and consumer confidence.

source: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-trump-must-end-capital-gains-tax-bitcoin

904
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/GreedVault on 2024-12-08 02:54:30.
905
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/GabeSter on 2024-12-08 02:53:48.

It seems inevitable, a coin pumps and people come to this sub to find out why, and for those that buy they have to hope it doesn't retrace. This post aims to give you the down low on Moons before that pump when people inevitably flock to the sub and ask "why are Moons pumping?". (I started writing this post when Moons were $.15 but am in the middle of a move so didn't finish it until today.)

I'll do my best to offer an unbiased take that covers both the good and the bad of Moons.

What are Moons?

If you aren't brand new to Crypto you've probably already heard about Moons to some extent. Moons are a governance token for r/cryptocurrency launched by Reddit, before they later sunset their involvement, burned their Moons, and renounced the contract. Hard locking supply and making Moons deflationary through the buy and burn engagement processes created through community governance. For more information on Moons check out the wiki (which may or may not be up to date: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/moons//_wiki/)

Breaking it Down:

The Good:

Perhaps a few of the most positive aspects of Moons are:

·       Brand Awareness

·       Low Marketcap (lots of potential upside)

·       Deflationary through multiple buy and burn mechanisms

·       Being a Governance Token for one of the single larges point of entries for new/upcoming CryptoCurrency enthusiasts.

The Bad:

·       Top Heavy Holders

·       Amateur Reddit Whales

·       We don’t pay entities for listings/marketings

Both Good and Bad:

·       Community Lead

---------

The Good

* Brand Awareness and a top-notch ticker:

Although Moons aren’t known by those outside the world of CryptoCurrency they’re pretty well known by CryptoCurrency enthusiasts, and every time a new entity buys and burns Moons another entity and their community becomes aware of the usecases and utility of Moons.

Also let’s get something straight the ticker ‘Moon’ is top notch.

* Low Marketcap and the potential upside:

In the world of CryptoCurrency the current marketcap of a project can help third parties decide if a project has potential upside or not. The marketcap of Moons Is astronomically small compared to most projects 18.4 Million, or in other words 184 BTC.

That isn’t to say a low marketcap guarantees upside but find another low marketcap crypto that is as well known and has as big of a community as Moons. You cant!

* The Deflationary Mechanisms of Moons

Let’s talk about Moons Circulating Supply! When Reddit was part of the project a decreasing amount of Moons were minted every month to be distributed. After Reddit sunset their involvement and burned the contract. Moon supply became capped and any burns decrease the circulating supply.

rCryptoCurrency offers various engagement options where approved entities can burn Moons for various forms of utility on the sub – such as hosting giveaways / running AMAs / customizing the banner. In fact 1% of Moons have been burned through this mechanism YTD. Moons burned through this process are often purchased off of the open market.

Additionally a portion of the funds used to purchase .moon domains from Unstoppable Domain (currently paused) will be directed to Moon burns.    

* rCryptoCurrency and the greater role in the CryptoCurrency ecosystem.

Moons started as a governance token for r/CryptoCurrency, where holders of the token can vote on governance for the subreddit and earn Moons through participation on the sub. These mechanisms by themselves bake the awareness of Moons into all users who participate on the sub.

Combined with the fact that r/CryptoCurrency is the single largest CryptoCurrency community on the internet this adds a whole new level of depth to the long-term value of Moons. Although many of these users may be off and on-again retail, some of these users will go on and embed themselves as builders in the CryptoCurrency industry, and empower the next generation of CryptoCurrency builders with the knowledge and awareness of Moons if nothing else it creates an abstract value proposition for the future.

The Bad:

* Top Heavy Holders:

With Moon Circulating Supply being ~79M total Moons, one only need 790K moons to hold 1% of Moons supply and with Moons being deflationary that number will decrease as time goes on. Although no one but a handful of Mods were able to earn 1% of the supply through the previous Reddit distribution model, many users such as myself were able to earn close to . 2% of the current supply through long term participation on the sub "Moon Farming" .

Given the fact that Moons are incredibly cheap and at one point dropped to around a 2.5M marketcap when Reddit sunset their involvement. There is a rightful concern to how many Moons were either earned or bought up by whales for cheap and their ability to sell and suppress price movement.

* Amateur Whales:

Moon volume has never been completely consistent although we are now at the point of basically having ~$100k a day volume – total volume fluctuates and the ability to buy/sell without creating huge price movement can fluctuate. This wouldn’t be particularly concerning if it wasn’t for Amateur Retail Reddit whales loving to market sell an entire position causing huge price fluctuations and potentially suppressing price discovery.

If you’ve been around Moons for awhile you’ll know of “Moon Farmers” who would market sell 120K+ Moons positions dropping the price $.07+ during price discovery.

* We don't pay for Marketing / Listings:

Did you know lots of companies like Binance, Kucoin, etc... will allow companies to pay for listings, and Crypto news companies will write sponsored content about projects in exchange for payment? This isn't something that Moons has or does. Although mods control a multi sig wallet that covers distributions we don't pay for any formal marketing or listings.

Both Good and Bad

* Community Lead:

Moons are Community Lead by volunteer moderators and members of the community and that might be Good or Bad depending on how you look at it.

Users and Mods are incentivized to make Moons better and to help grow the community as to expand value propositions for outsiders and to increase the value of the tokens that they hold.

In this way Moons are like the early community of Doge. We love our community and we volunteer our time to try and help build and grow our community. Being community lead we don’t have financial backers or VC firms to help our growth. It’s all up to us.


Note on circulating supply:

Although it is true that Moons are deflationary with the circulating supply having dropped over 1% so far in 2024 that doesn’t mean Moons will increase in value. A decrease in supply means price would increase if demand stays constant or goes up. Of course there is no guarantee Moon demand will increase or stay constant. Moons often go through wild swings of demand which creates price volatility and demand can fluctuate wildly.

Disclaimer: in December 2023 when Moons were ~$.13 and still recovering from the sunset drama I recognized Moons as being undervalued for the reasons stated above and converted my entire crypto portfolio to Moons. I will look to convert some of those Moons back into BTC in the future.

TLDR: Moons imo have insane value prop but there is rightful concern about top heavy holders and Retail whales.

Final note: Despite being long this is a very surface level approach to the value prop of Moons, there is a lot more to know for those wanting to find out about the project.

906
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Two_Pickachu_One_Cup on 2024-12-08 02:27:47.

Litecoin has made good gains so far this bull cycle. If you are thinking of investing in Litecoin here are a few useful upsides that people may not know about.

  1. Litecoin is merge mined with Dogecoin.

Wayback when, Dogecoin was on the verge of extinction until an offer was made by the Litecoin mining community (loosely) to merge mine with Dogecoin. Dogecoin would not exist without Litecoin.

  1. Litecoin has "optional privacy".

Litecoin has an opt in privacy feature called MWEB. The rationale behind the "opt in" feature is so that Litecoin can still comply with privacy regulations and remain listed on exchanges, whilst not as useful as a full "mandatory" privacy feature its still handy to know.

  1. Litecoin is an OG fork of Bitcoin with 100 percent uptime.

Not many people know that Litecoin is one of the only OG cryptocurrencies with 100 percent uptime. Not even bitcoin can claim 100 percent uptime. The network is reliable, decently fast (not the fastest) and has minimal transaction fees.

  1. As an OG cryptocurrency it has the potential for EFT approval.

Some argue that Litecoin is close to EFT approval due to its OG status, reliability and potential upside.

  1. Litecoin has no founder stash

This point is controversial. The creator of Litecoin sold his stash a while back which drew some criticism from the community. Whilst it did draw its criticism, the upside to this is that Litecoin may not fall foul of any heavy regulations as you could call it truley decentralised. The founder of ETH still has a massive founders stack.

Litecoins is no doubt a great fundamental coin, its price action has been a little lacklustre over the years but it could be a sleeper if markets start to price fundamentals into the base price. Thanks for reading :)

907
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/spankthawank on 2024-12-08 02:13:15.

All around us there are posts upon posts hyping up cryptocurrency. Everyone is telling you “Bitcoin will keep rising!” Or “You can still get in!”. Many inexperienced people lose money because they get FOMO. They buy in to late.

But FOMO does not only create a willingness to buy. It also fuels the fear of selling too early. Bitcoin has already made great gains. Why risk it all for that last 10-20%. Ofcourse you might want to hold on a little longer. But be prepared to sell, because at some point the bear market will arrive.

Investments should be made to make money. So don’t let it rot in your wallet for the rest of your life. Taking profits is the most important part of investing. Don’t feel bad about missing the top, and enjoy the gains we have made.

908
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/InclineDumbbellPress on 2024-12-08 01:58:48.
909
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/j_stars on 2024-12-08 01:45:15.
910
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/spankthawank on 2024-12-08 01:43:08.
911
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/messified on 2024-12-08 01:21:30.
912
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/CryptoDaily- on 2024-12-08 00:00:49.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.


 

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.


 

Rules:

  • All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
  • Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
  • Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
  • Comments will be sorted by newest first.

 

Useful Links:


 

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

913
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Specific-Ad7048 on 2024-12-07 23:29:53.
914
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/CriticalCobraz on 2024-12-07 23:28:35.
915
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/goldyluckinblokchain on 2024-12-07 22:54:12.
916
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/partymsl on 2024-12-07 22:52:00.
917
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/MericanInBKK on 2024-12-07 22:35:30.

Alright, r/CryptoCurrency fam, let’s talk about Moons. No, not the ones in the sky. The ones we’ve been earning, tipping, and memeing about here on this subreddit. If you’re not paying attention to Moons right now, you might be missing out on what could become the next big thing. Let me break it down (with a sprinkle of humor and a dash of seriousness).

🚀 Why Moons Might Actually Be Worth Buying

  1. Fixed Supply, Growing Demand

Moons are capped at 250 million total supply, but here’s the kicker—no new Moons are being minted anymore. That’s right, this is a deflationary asset. Add to that the fact that Moons are burned with every transaction, and you’ve got a recipe for scarcity. Think of it like Pokémon cards but with less cardboard and more crypto nerds.

  1. The Great Decentralization Move

Reddit said, “Moons, you’re free now, go live your best decentralized life,” and Moons left the Vault system for the wild, wild Web3. This means no corporate overlords dictating their fate—just us, the community. Decentralized = infinite possibilities, including integrations into broader crypto ecosystems.

  1. Utility Beyond Just Reddit?

Okay, hear me out. Right now, Moons are mostly used for tipping, voting on subreddit governance, and flexing your crypto wealth. But what happens when someone decides to integrate Moons into NFT marketplaces, DeFi platforms, or metaverse economies? The possibilities are endless. A Moon-backed game? Pay for merch with Moons? It’s all on the table.

  1. Look at the Price Action

Moons are currently trading at $0.19–$0.26, with a market cap of just ~$28 million. Compare that to meme coins with billion-dollar valuations and no utility (looking at you, Dogecoin). Moons have surged over 67% this week alone. It’s volatile, yes, but it’s also alive and kicking.

  1. Token Burn = Rocket Fuel

Every transaction burns Moons, and no new ones are being created. This deflationary mechanism means supply decreases while demand grows. Less supply = 🚀 (in theory, anyway).

TL;DR: Why Buy Moons?

Moons are no longer just subreddit points—they’re evolving into a real asset with deflationary supply, solid community backing, and the potential for utility beyond Reddit. Whether you’re here for the memes or the moonshots, Moons might just be worth a closer look.

So, what’s it gonna be? Are you buying the next Doge, but smarter, or sitting on the sidelines? Discuss below, and may the Moons be ever in your wallet’s favor.

918
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/MericanInBKK on 2024-12-07 22:27:47.

Hey everyone,

I’ve been diving deeper into the world of blockchain projects and came across EOS. It’s hard to ignore its history—it was once considered an “Ethereum killer,” raising a record $4 billion during its ICO and promising fast transactions, scalability, and zero fees. However, over the years, EOS seems to have lost its momentum. I rarely hear it mentioned alongside other major players like Ethereum, Solana, or Avalanche.

That said, I’ve noticed some chatter about the EOS Network Foundation (ENF) spearheading a revival. This has me wondering: does EOS still have a shot at becoming a major player in the blockchain space? Or is it too late?

Here’s what I know so far:

Strengths of EOS: From a technical standpoint, EOS has a lot going for it. The delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) model allows for high-speed transactions with no fees, which seems ideal for scalability. This is particularly attractive compared to Ethereum’s often high gas fees (even after the Merge).

The Downfall: Despite the initial promise, EOS’s reputation took a hit due to centralization concerns, governance issues, and accusations of mismanagement by Block.one. As a result, it didn’t achieve the level of adoption many expected, especially when compared to Ethereum or even newer chains like Solana.

Recent Developments: I’ve read that the ENF, led by Yves La Rose, is trying to breathe new life into the ecosystem. There’s talk of improving governance, developing partnerships, and expanding interoperability with other blockchains, including Ethereum. I’ve also seen claims that EOS is pivoting to position itself as a top-tier platform for Web3 development.

So, I’m reaching out to this community for insights and advice. Here are my specific questions:

  1. What’s the investment case for EOS in 2024? Are there any strong use cases, partnerships, or dApps being built that make it stand out today? Have adoption rates or developer activity picked up recently?
  2. How credible are the revival efforts by the EOS Network Foundation? Are there tangible signs of progress, or is this more of a PR move to regain relevance?
  3. What are the risks of investing in EOS? The concerns around centralization, governance, and ecosystem stagnation still linger. Have these issues been addressed, or are they still valid?
  4. Why should people buy EOS now? For those of you who are bullish, what’s your thesis? Is it based on new developments, market cycles, or long-term potential?

I’m also open to hearing from skeptics. If you think EOS is a lost cause or a poor investment, I’d like to understand why. I’m not here to shill or FUD; I genuinely want to weigh the pros and cons of this project before making any moves.

Lastly, if you believe there are better Layer 1 projects out there that are currently undervalued or overlooked, please share those as well. I’m always on the lookout for high-potential opportunities.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and advice!

919
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Odd-Radio-8500 on 2024-12-07 22:04:27.
920
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/kirtash93 on 2024-12-07 21:58:30.
921
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/sadiq_238 on 2024-12-07 21:39:53.
922
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Abdeliq on 2024-12-07 21:12:04.
923
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/wonderingdev on 2024-12-07 20:56:49.
924
1
Why Algorand? (zerobytes.monster)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/gigabyteIO on 2024-12-07 19:54:54.

What distinguishes Algorand is its ability to excel in all core technical areas without sacrificing any other. This is largely because of intelligent design decisions when creating the chain, its consensus mechanism, and its underlying guts. It's that "overall package" that distinguishes it for me. Lots of chains are on parity with (or sometimes exceed) Algo in one metric or another. But, when you look holistically, Algorand stacks up well on all fronts while lots of others fall short in one particular area. In addition, it has lots of other plus factors.

  • Throughput without Sacrifice: Algorand's Layer 1 can handle high volume without sacrificing anything. It can currently handle around 12k TPS and has exceeded that mark in single blocks in the real world. This already exceeds what VISA's network handles on average per second, and already blows most chains out of the water. Though the capacity isn't needed right now, block pipelining could take us to 46k even without L2s or sharding. Now, some other L1s either currently handle more TPS or have a theoretical upper limit that exceeds Algorand's. But, those chains either are bullshitting you or they fall short in other critical areas (e.g. decentralization). Let's take a couple examples from some big market cap coins.
    • Solana advertises 65k max TPS, but they are full of shit. Due to technical bottlenecks their max real throughput is closer to 20k. But even that number is padded because 75% of Solana transactions are on-chain vote transactions (which is just bad design IMO). This is why they have never pushed the chain past a couple thousand *actual* transactions without (a) astronomical failure rates (there is even a block where essentially 100% of all non-vote transactions failed; (b) their chain skipping blocks and having other wonky issues; or (c) just shutting down entirely. Mind you, they essentially require supercomputers to do this while Algorand bests them using hardware that is essentially a maxed out Raspberry Pi 5.
    • Chains like Sui and Hedera will advertise huge TPS, but the tradeoff is permissionlessness and decentralization. The chains are de facto controlled by centralized entities, and this is essentially required because of how their networks operate. They are DAGS (directed acyclic graphs) instead of blockchains. DAG's require supercomputers to run and their performance drops off tremendously when you increase nodes or geographical distribution. Want to run a Hedera node? You can't. That's reserved to the ~30 corporations on their governing council. Want to run a Sui node? All you need is a supercomputer and hundreds of millions of dollars to buy up an unfathomable amount of circulating supply.
  • Speed and Instant Finality: Algorand is fast. It puts out blocks approximately every 2.8 seconds. And, it can go even faster if needed. Importantly though, it also has instant finality. Finality time is the time it takes to guarantee that transactions cannot be altered, reversed, reorganized, or canceled after they are in a block. Algorand's chain is essentially impossible to fork (i.e. to have two competing blocks or series of blocks). That means transactions are instantly final as soon as they are verified in a block. Other chains can fork, and thus must wait for multiple block confirmations to say with sufficient probability that a transaction is final. Finality is critical for real world commerce. In the real world, nobody is going to let you walk out of a store because your crypto payment will "probably" go through.
    • Legacy chains are slow and not suited to everyday use. Bitcoin finality takes 6 blocks at 10 min/block. ETH has a finality time on Layer 1 of something like 14 minutes. Cardano is something like 5-10 minutes.
    • Other "fast" chains either aren't as fast as they claim, or make significant compromises on decentralization to achieve that speed. For example, Solana is seen as fast because it has 400 millisecond block time. But, those transactions aren't actually final. It takes 32 confirmations to be final, which is 12.8 seconds. (This may seem trivial, but think about the difference it makes for things like event ticketing, or just staring blankly at the cashier for 13 seconds vs. 3 or less). Hedera is pretty quick, but not as fast as Algo. Sui is super fast to finality (something I'm impressed with), but again (as mentioned above) it's achieved through a de facto permissioned and centralized system.
    • Another good comparison is Avalanche. It has fast block times, they finalize quickly thereafter, and they don't have the same centralization concerns as those listed above. But, importantly, it is not instant finality. This may seem trivial to you, but it is not trivial when it comes to developing on chain. Even if transactions are finalized fast (and so you don't have to wait around as long), if there is any lag between block verification and finality, its is something you must engineer around. Additionally, there are things that Algorand blows Avax out of the water on, such as throughput, smart contract handling, fees, etc.
  • Elegant Consensus Mechanism Designed for Decentralization: Algorand has an elegant consensus mechanism that allows its validators to run on low cost hardware. Other highly performant chains effectively require supercomputers to run. For example, Sui requires 24 cores and 128GB RAM to validate (of course, the harder part is first owning hundreds of millions of dollars of SUI). Solana requires 12 cores and 128GB RAM (and also a large amount of SOL since it's goofy consensus mechanism clogs its own network and so charges validators for voting transactions). Algorand validators can run on a maxed out Raspberry Pi 5. It's built for decentralization and maximum participation. It's Pure Proof of Stake design means anybody, no matter the size of your holdings, can participate in consensus with no epochs, no lockups, no slashing, etc. We are moving to a "staking rewards" program to reward validators, which does have a 30k Algo minimum (which can be lowered later). But, importantly, that is not a prerequisite for running a node. A person with 1 Algo can still run a node if they want. Instead, it's a necessary component for being able to monitor node health with statistical significance (poorly performing nodes do not receive rewards). In short, Algorand is probably the most egalitarian proof of stake consensus mechanism out there. It is designed for decentralization.
  • AVM vs. EVM: Many chains either explicitly use Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) or some derivative of it for coding. That is great for porting over existing Ethereum projects in a copy/paste fashion (which is why EVM chains explode quickly in terms of apps). However, that also means you are adopting the limitations of EVM. Algorand opted to build its system from the ground up with the Algorand Virtual Machine. If you want a technical rundown on benefits of AVM vs. EVM, I'm sure someone here can go into more detail. But here are some examples.
    • Native layer assets: Assets on most chains are smart contracts. Interacting with the token is interacting with a smart contract. The problem with that is that smart contracts can be malicious. That's why people say to never interact with dust in your wallets. Assets on Algorand are not smart contracts, but rather native layer assets. They operate with the same level of security and ease of use as the native Algo. In addition to security, this gives them a variety of other benefits. A big one is atomic swapping. Assets can be exchanged, trustlessly, on Algorand without needing to code or interact with a smart contract.
    • Smart contract handling. Not all transactions are created equal when it comes to consumption of the network. Things like DEX swaps are a good example. They require smart contracts and are more taxing than things like simple sends or atomic swaps. AVM is incredibly more efficient in its handling of these and so we blow every single EVM chain out of the water in terms of how many such transactions we can handle.
  • Post Quantum Security: Algorand pioneered the use of FALCON encryption, which has now been formally adopted by the National Institution of Standards and Technology (NIST) as one of only a few quantum resistant cryptographic algorithms. Quantum computing is coming. A chain that is not quantum secure will be vulnerable to attack. Maybe it won't be today, this year, or next year, but in the not too distant future, chains that are not quantum resistant are going to get attacked and when they do, they will fail in spectacular fashion. To my knowledge we are the only chain with a quantum resistant chain history, and in 2025 should become fully quantum secure with quantum resistant VRF for consensus and with quantum wallets.
  • Reliability: Over five years running with zero downtime. Almost no other network can claim this type of reliability. Certainly Solana can't. Not even centralized stuff like Sui or Base can claim that type of reliability. And, when you issue a transaction it either goes through or you don't pay for it. Other networks can have ridiculously high failure rates, and they charge you for them.
  • World Class Developer Tools: If you are a developer, you'll appreciate AlgoKitand how easy it makes developing.
925
 
 
The original post: /r/cryptocurrency by /u/CragBawz on 2024-12-07 19:37:07.
view more: ‹ prev next ›