/r/AMD — For all things Ryzen, Radeon and more

9 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
26
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-10 21:57:53.
27
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/SuperSimpSons on 2024-11-11 02:00:31.
28
1
My build (www.reddit.com)
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/Snoo38152 on 2024-11-10 19:48:35.
29
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/Voodoo2-SLi on 2024-11-10 16:18:09.

  • compilation of 19 launch reviews with ~4720 application benchmarks & ~1640 gaming benchmarks
  • stock performance on default power limits, no overclocking, memory speeds explained here
  • only gaming benchmarks for real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks
  • gaming benchmarks strictly at CPU limited settings, mostly at 720p or 1080p 1% min/99th percentile
  • power consumption is strictly for the CPU (package) only, no whole system consumption
  • geometric mean in all cases
  • performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks
  • tables are sometimes very wide, the last column to the right is the 9800X3D at 100%
  • retailer prices according to Geizhals (Germany, on Nov 10, incl. 19% VAT) and Newegg (USA, on Nov 10) for immediately available offers
  • performance results as a graph
  • for the full results and more explanations check 3DCenter's Ryzen 7 9800X3D Launch Analysis
  • TLDR: on average, 9800X3D brings +22.2% more application performance and +11.5% more gaming performance over 7800X3D

 

| Appl. | 78X3D | 9700X | 9900X | 9950X | 146K | 147K | 149K | 245K | 265K | 285K | 98X3D | |


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


| | | 8C Zen4 | 8C Zen5 | 12C Zen5 | 16C Zen5 | 6P+8E RPL | 8P+12E RPL | 8P+16E RPL | 6P+8E ARL | 8P+12E ARL | 8P+16E ARL | 8C Zen5 | | CompB | 79.9% | 86.8% | 116.4% | 140.9% | 88.7% | 118.9% | 127.7% | 95.0% | 126.4% | 142.8% | 100% | | Guru3D | 82.5% | 89.4% | 126.5% | 155.2% | 97.0% | 125.3% | 135.7% | 93.7% | 127.1% | 148.7% | 100% | | HWCo | 77.1% | 80.5% | 123.8% | 144.0% | 90.7% | 119.7% | 132.3% | 95.7% | 124.2% | 142.2% | 100% | | HWL | 80.8% | 86.6% | 125.3% | 143.3% | 91.0% | 121.5% | 131.5% | 90.4% | 124.5% | 141.9% | 100% | | HotHW | 85.3% | 91.7% | 117.3% | 134.4% | 91.4% | 110.7% | 122.1% | 90.7% | – | 127.4% | 100% | | Linus | 84.2% | 97.4% | 125.8% | 149.3% | 87.5% | 114.2% | 125.2% | 92.2% | 121.8% | 134.9% | 100% | | PCGH | 82.5% | 94.6% | 124.1% | 144.9% | – | 113.0% | 124.8% | 94.2% | 112.9% | 124.6% | 100% | | Phoro | 74.6% | 89.2% | 112.4% | 126.7% | 75.2% | – | 95.6% | 84.5% | – | 107.9% | 100% | | TPU | 85.1% | 94.1% | 112.0% | 125.1% | 93.3% | 110.2% | 119.5% | 95.6% | 113.3% | 121.0% | 100% | | TS/HUB | 84.4% | 89.3% | 124.0% | 147.2% | 92.6% | 121.5% | 131.1% | 95.0% | 124.8% | 141.4% | 100% | | Tom's | 80.7% | 98.2% | 120.7% | 139.3% | 94.2% | 116.8% | 127.3% | 99.3% | 124.6% | 138.1% | 100% | | Tweak's | 80.5% | 97.8% | 114.1% | 128.6% | 87.5% | 105.6% | 114.0% | 86.1% | 106.7% | 116.7% | 100% | | WCCF | 86.1% | 96.5% | 128.4% | 145.8% | 100.7% | 121.7% | 136.5% | 107.4% | – | 148.3% | 100% | | avg Appl. Perf. | 81.8% | 91.4% | 120.1% | 139.0% | 91.2% | 114.1% | 124.6% | 94.0% | 119.1% | 132.7% | 100% | | Power Limit | 162W | 88W | 162W | 200W | 181W | 253W | 253W | 159W | 250W | 250W | 162W | | MSRP | $449 | $359 | $499 | $649 | $319 | $409 | $589 | $309 | $394 | $589 | $479 | | Retail GER | 467€ | 333€ | 450€ | 652€ | 246€ | 369€ | 464€ | 335€ | 439€ | 650€ | 529€ | | Perf/€ GER | 93% | 145% | 141% | 113% | 196% | 164% | 142% | 149% | 144% | 108% | 100% | | Retail US | $489 | $326 | $419 | $660 | $236 | $347 | $438 | $319 | $400 | $630 | $479 | | Perf/$ US | 80% | 134% | 137% | 101% | 185% | 158% | 136% | 141% | 143% | 101% | 100% |

 

| Games | 78X3D | 9700X | 9900X | 9950X | 146K | 147K | 149K | 245K | 265K | 285K | 98X3D | |


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


| | | 8C Zen4 | 8C Zen5 | 12C Zen5 | 16C Zen5 | 6P+8E RPL | 8P+12E RPL | 8P+16E RPL | 6P+8E ARL | 8P+12E ARL | 8P+16E ARL | 8C Zen5 | | CompB | 89.3% | 74.8% | 73.2% | 75.3% | 70.0% | 76.8% | 76.0% | 68.5% | 72.1% | 73.7% | 100% | | Eurog | 85.6% | 82.1% | 79.0% | 81.5% | 69.5% | 79.2% | 79.6% | 64.3% | – | 72.3% | 100% | | GNexus | 86.6% | 77.0% | ~73% | 76.1% | 70.4% | 79.7% | 82.6% | 69.4% | 74.3% | 78.5% | 100% | | HWCan | 90.8% | 88.5% | 85.8% | 86.5% | 67.8% | 74.1% | 78.8% | 71.9% | – | 78.8% | 100% | | HWCo | 91.3% | 80.2% | 80.0% | 82.8% | 75.5% | 82.1% | 83.0% | 69.3% | 73.1% | 76.0% | 100% | | HWL | 84.2% | 71.7% | 74.5% | 77.6% | 69.9% | 78.0% | 78.1% | 66.6% | 71.0% | 72.7% | 100% | | KitG | 89.5% | 81.6% | 83.1% | 86.8% | 71.5% | 84.1% | 86.9% | 68.9% | 72.2% | 74.6% | 100% | | Linus | 90.8% | 86.4% | – | 83.8% | 74.2% | 78.6% | 81.0% | 71.9% | 74.6% | 73.5% | 100% | | PCGH | 90.4% | 76.4% | 76.6% | 79.9% | – | 84.7% | 86.2% | 71.1% | 74.9% | 77.4% | 100% | | Quasar | 93.7% | 86.2% | – | 88.1% | – | 79.9% | 82.4% | – | 77.4% | 81.1% | 100% | | SweCl | 85.6% | 74.2% | – | 79.5% | 68.9% | 75.8% | 80.3% | 68.2% | – | 79.5% | 100% | | TPU | 92.7% | 84.0% | 82.5% | 84.0% | 81.0% | 85.5% | 87.8% | 77.4% | 79.9% | 82.3% | 100% | | TS/HUB | 91.3% | 76.5% | – | 77.2% | – | – | 77.9% | – | – | 74.5% | 100% | | Tom's | 85.1% | 78.4% | 74.3% | 77.7% | – | 74.3% | 75.0% | – | 71.6% | 75.0% | 100% | | avg Game Perf. | 89.7% | 79.4% | 78.3% | 80.9% | 73.7% | 79.9% | 81.5% | 70.4% | 74.0% | 76.7% | 100% | | Power Limit | 162W | 88W | 162W | 200W | 181W | 253W | 253W | 159W | 250W | 250W | 162W | | MSRP | $449 | $359 | $499 | $649 | $319 | $409 | $589 | $309 | $394 | $589 | $479 | | Retail GER | 467€ | 333€ | 450€ | 652€ | 246€ | 369€ | 464€ | 335€ | 439€ | 650€ | 529€ | | Perf/€ GER | 102% | 126% | 92% | 66% | 158% | 115% | 93% | 111% | 89% | 62% | 100% | | Retail US | $489 | $326 | $419 | $660 | $236 | $347 | $438 | $319 | $400 | $630 | $479 | | Perf/$ US | 88% | 117% | 89% | 59% | 149% | 110% | 89% | 106% | 89% | 58% | 100% |

 

| Games | 5700X3D | 5800X3D | 7800X3D | 9800X3D | |


|


|


|


|


| | | 8C Zen3 | 8C Zen3 | 8C Zen4 | 8C Zen5 | | ComputerBase | - | 100% | 127.6% | 142.9% | | Eurogamer | 94.6% | 100% | 115.7% | 135.1% | | Gamers Nexus | 91.2% | 100% | 110.3% | 127.3% | | Hardware Canucks | 91.8% | 100% | 119.9% | 132.1% | | Hardwareluxx | - | 100% | 118.6% | 140.9% | | Linus Tech Tips | - | 100% | 111.9% | 123.2% | | PC Games Hardware | 91.8% | 100% | 121.3% | 134.2% | | Quasarzone | - | 100% | 113.1% | 120.7% | | SweClockers | - | 100% | 110.8% | 129.4% | | TechPowerUp | - | 100% | 119.6% | 129.0% | | TechSpot | - | 100% | 124.8% | 136.7% | | Tom's Hardware | 90.2% | - | 114.8% | 134.8% | | avg Gaming Perf. | ~92% | 100% | 118.7% | 132.3% |

 

| Power Draw | 78X3D | 9700X | 9900X | 9950X | 146K | 147K | 149K | 245K | 265K | 285K | 98X3D | |


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


| | | 8C Zen4 | 8C Zen5 | 12C Zen5 | 16C Zen5 | 6P+8E RPL | 8P+12E RPL | 8P+16E RPL | 6P+8E ARL | 8P+12E ARL | 8P+16E ARL | 8C Zen5 | | CB24 @Tweak | 104W | 117W | 198W | 244W | 191W | 252W | 274W | 157W | 238W | 263W | 163W | | Blender @TPU | 74W | 80W | 173W | 220W | 145W | 222W | 281W | 134W | 155W | 235W | 155W | | Premiere @Tweak | 85W | 117W | 189W | 205W | 152W | 223W | 228W | 121W | 156W | 149W | 139W | | Handbrake @Tom's | 74W | 127W | 156W | 192W | 179W | 224W | 227W | 105W | 151W | 177W | 116W | | AutoCAD @Igor's | 63W | 77W | - | 77W | 75W | 128W | 141W | 50W | 64W | 59W | ? | | Ø6 Appl. @PCGH | 74W | 83W | 149W | 180W | 151W | 180W | 174W | 107W | 138W | 152W | 105W | | Ø47 Appl. @TPU | 48W | 61W | 113W | 135W | 90W | 140W | 180W | 78W | 108W | 132W | 88W | | Ø15 Game @CB | 61W | 87W | 109W | 112W | 119W | 163W | 167W | 62W | 77W | 83W | 83W | | Ø15 Game @HWCan | 54W | 82W | 97W | 103W | 107W | 154W | 147W | 68W | - | 86W | 61W | | Ø13 Game @TPU | 46W | 71W | 100W | 104W | 76W | 116W | 149W | 61W | 77W | 94W | 65W | | Ø13 Game @Tom's | 66W | 96W | 108W | 111W | 98W | 126W | 122W | 59W | 67W | 78W | 77W | | Ø10 Game @PCGH | 49W | 82W | 102W | 118W | 107W | 124W | 127W | 67W | 76W | 83W | 69W | | Ø6 Game @Igor's | 65W | 98W | - | 118W | 104W | 136W | 131W | 92W | 105W | 104W | ? | | avg Appl. Power | 65W | 81W | 135W | 160W | 121W | 174W | 198W | 95W | 127W | 147W | 107W | | Appl. Power Efficiency | 134% | 120% | 95% | 93% | 80% | 70% | 67% | 106% | 100% | 96% | 100% | | avg Game Power | 56W | 86W | 105W | 111W | 101W | 135W | 140W | 67W | 79W | 88W | 73W | | Game Power Efficiency | 116% | 68% | 54% | 53% | 53% | 43% | 42% | 76% | 68% | 64% | 100% | | Power Limit | 162W | 88W | 162W | 200W | 181W | 253W | 253W | 159W | 250W | 250W | 162W | | MSRP | $449 | $359 | $499 | $649 | $319 | $409 | $589 | $309 | $394 | $589 | $479 |

The power consumption values from Igor's Lab will be added as soon as they are available. However, they will then no longer be included in the index values.

 

at a glance: Ryzen 7 9800X3D has more gaming performance than...

+25.9% vs Ryzen 7 9700X

+23.5% vs Ryzen 9 9950X

+22.8% vs Core i9-14900K

+30.4% vs Core Ultra 9 285K

+32.3% vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D

 

Source: 3DCenter.org

Disclaimer: Voodoo2-SLi on Reddit and Leonidas on 3DCenter are the same person. So, I write these reviews by myself for 3DCenter and translate the performance tables for Reddit by myself. No copy and paste of other people's work.

30
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-10 14:05:26.
31
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/ThatsPurttyGood101 on 2024-11-10 11:06:18.
32
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-10 10:36:30.
33
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/T1beriu on 2024-11-10 06:37:04.
34
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/BadReIigion on 2024-11-10 01:46:31.
35
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/Upset_Programmer6508 on 2024-11-09 23:48:32.
36
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-09 16:16:16.
37
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/rawintellect on 2024-11-09 14:07:59.

https://preview.redd.it/xrnnnb2uuvzd1.jpg?width=4000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c6770aa7e4313e3e6d21e0980f76e4ac3d215e61

Asus X399-E Gaming Motherboaard

128GB DDR4 3600

Custom Loop

Red Devil AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB GDDR6

38
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-09 12:14:00.
39
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-09 10:53:02.
40
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/GradSchoolDismal429 on 2024-11-09 02:48:56.
41
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/ASUS_MKTLeeM on 2024-11-09 02:40:31.

https://preview.redd.it/95no1dzsfszd1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=081e65d3d58c8f9bee160f43f82337b0a62522d3

This is the latest first batch of updates including the AGESA Combo AM5 PI 1.2.0.2a to support the Ryzen 9000X3D Series on most of our AM5 motherboards. We also introduce the Turbo Game Mode, which enhances performance in certain games. Other motherboards have updates from previous AGESA versions.

If you are looking for a board that might not be on this list, please take a look at our previous BIOS updates:

*PLEASE NOTE – IF YOUR MOTHERBOARD IS LISTED AND NOT YET AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE, IT MAY TAKE UP TO A FEW EXTRA DAYS FOR IT TO SHOW UP. PLEASE BE PATIENT.*

New UEFI BIOS updates For ASUS AMD motherboards – W45

*Please do not ask about motherboards not listed. Please review the FAQ below for details.

What's new

AMD -

For most X870, X670, most B650, and A620 boards -

  • Include Turbo Game Mode: Enhance performance in certain games.*
  • Update AGESA Version to Combo AM5 PI 1.2.0.2a: Enhance compatibility and performance.

*Except for ASUS EX-B650 V7 and ASUS EX-B650 V7 Plus

For X570, B550, and A520 boards -

  • Updated AGESA to version ComboV2PI 1.2.0.Cc.
  • Resolved CPU exception when adjusting items like "When system is in sleep, hibernate, or soft off states" in certain languages.

AMD – A520, A620, B550, B650, X670, X870

AMD

  • X series – X570, X670, X870
  • B series – B550, B650
  • A series – A520, A620
  • W series –
  • T series –

UEFI BIOS update list noted below – A total of 92 boards with a UEFI BIOS update.

W is in relation to the workweek; November 4th - November 10th 2024

FAQ -

Why is my motherboard not listed?

If you are looking for your motherboard/model, please visit https://www.asus.com/us/support/ and check if it has been updated recently. UEFI's BIOS updates are commonly released in waves; as such, it can take a series of motherboards, weeks, or months to have all motherboards have the same corresponding UEFI BIOS update issued. Furthermore, remember that not all updates apply or apply to all models. Due to inherent design differences and specification and feature variation, an update may only apply to a specific model.

How long are motherboards supported with UEFI BIOS updates? How long should I monitor for an update?

In most cases, after a year, boards tend to reach a certain maturity level and see fewer updates. Mature releases can often be seen within the first six months. All non-BETA releases pass qualification and validation. If you feel you have an issue dependent on a UEFI release, please submit a support ticket. Some boards can sometimes see updates for more than 24 months. Also, user experience can vary considerably based on end-use-defined parameters and system configurations ( such as overclocking/performance tuning ). Users running stock operating parameters will experience the least amount of issues.

I want to update, but I am unsure how to update the UEFI "BIOS"?

If you want guidance on how to flash/update your UEFI BIOS, please watch the video linked below. It will guide you through the flashing process and provide insight into essential items to keep in mind when flashing/updating the UEFI BIOS.

How to Flash / Update your UEFI BIOS on ASUS Motherboards -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scK8AP8ZACc

Should I update the UEFI if my system is stable and running without issue?

If your system is running without issue, especially if overclocked in any way (including DRAM), it is recommended you stay on the build/release you are on. Changes to underlying auto rules and other operating parameters can change the OC experience and require you to retune a previously stable OC value. This does not mean the UEFI is not a functioning/reliable release but that changes in the underlying code base must be accounted for when tuning a system. As many of these values are low-level, it is best to retune from UEFI defaults. Verifying the UEFI's system stability is also recommended via a stress test, like Passmark Burn-in Test, OCCT, AIDA64, or a similar stress test.

Users who update from stock to stock settings will generally experience the smoothest transition experience.

Will a UEFI update improve my overclocking experience?

A UEFI update can improve multiple aspects of the OC experience, whether extending frequencies or stabilizing them, improving general system stability, or adding new options relative to overclocking. It is important to note that overclocking has inherent mitigating factors, including silicon variance, which cannot be overcome purely from a UEFI update.

Will a UEFI update change my operating experience? Power consumption, temperatures, etc?

Changes to underlying auto rules and other operating parameters can affect aspects like CPU boosting behaviors. There can also be changes to UEFI BIOS auto rules. A UEFI BIOS update can affect operating temperature, performance scores, power consumption, etc. Comparisons should be made at like-to-like values, ideally meaning the same settings, applications, etc. It is also recommended this occur at F5 defaults.

Sometimes, you may need to reinstall the OS after a UEFI BIOS update to gauge its stability correctly. This means that the end operating experience should be first verified with default operating values (F5) and, ideally, a fresh installation of chipset drivers, an updated build of Windows, and a non-modified Windows power profile.

What if the UEFI BIOS listed is a BETA? Should I update?

BETA UEFI releases are for enthusiasts who want access to the latest features, functions, microcode enhancements, and overall UEFI improvements. They are not recommended for day-to-day/long-term use. Users who plan to use their system in this capacity and want to ensure the best interoperability/compatibility, stability, and performance should wait for a formal release.

Not every user should update/flash their UEFI BIOS. Again, if you are running without issue(s), you are advised to stay on the release you are running.

Notes to consider -

* When flashing, please perform the update process at UEFI BIOS defaults. Do NOT flash with an overclocked system/profile.

Your warranty is still applicable under the use of a UEFI BIOS update.

  1. I recommend updating the UEFI BIOS on your motherboard for new PC builds. This helps to ensure the best interoperability, compatibility, and performance. If you are building a PC and have not installed the OS, I recommend updating the UEFI.
  2. Remember that flashing/updating the UEFI will reset all defined parameters/settings and operating profiles. You cannot restore defined values using a UEFI Profile, as profiles are not interoperable between builds. You should note or screenshot (F12) your values before flashing if they are complex. Upon completing a flash, I recommend you load UEFI defaults after the fact, perform a reboot, and shut down before reloading or entering any customized UEFI values.
  3. When you update the UEFI and reload UEFI defaults depending on your defined initial BOOT values, you may need to adjust CSM settings, enabling or disabling CSM. If you experience BOOT-related issues after an update, please change the CSM accordingly.
  4. Be advised that in some cases, a rollback to a prior UEFI is not possible. This can occur when an update includes a CPU microcode ( such as an AMD AEGSA or Intel ME ). This means you may be unable to "flashback" to a prior release.
  5. While not always necessary, some UEFI updates may require clearing the CMOS to reset the UEFI and ensure normal functionality. You may need to CLR the CMOS to have the system POST after you flash. You can clear the CMOS via the CLR CMOS button if your motherboard supports it or by removing the onboard CMOS battery for at least a few minutes. You can also attempt to locate the CLR CMOS jumper on the motherboard and short the pins to clear the CMOS.
  6. Some updates will cause PCIe remapping and reinitialization of onboard controllers/devices. In these cases, you may need to reinstall drivers including your chipset drivers, graphics drivers or other PCIe or USB linked based devices.

It is also recommended you back up your system before any flash/update. Ideally, it would be best to load UEFI BIOS defaults (F5) before performing a flash/update; do not flash with an overclocked configuration.

Ensure you reboot before flashing once you have loaded (F5 defaults).

The board model/name is on the right-hand side, and the version number is on the left-hand side. To download the UEFI BIOS, please go to https://www.asus.com/support/

AMD UEFI BIOS Releases –

  1. A620M-AYW WIFI - 3057
  2. B650M-AYW WIFI - 3057
  3. EX-B650M-V7 - 3058
  4. EX-B650M-V7 PLUS - 3058
  5. PRIME A520M-A II - 3611
  6. PRIME A520M-K - 3611
  7. PRIME A520M-R - 3611
  8. PRIME A620M-A - 3057
  9. PRIME A620M-E - 3057
  10. PRIME A620M-K - 3057
  11. PRIME A620-PLUS WIFI - 3057 1...

Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/1gn05mu/asus_uefi_bios_updates_for_asus_amd_motherboards/

42
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/AMD718 on 2024-11-08 23:06:30.
43
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-08 17:08:19.
44
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/Tiny-Independent273 on 2024-11-08 16:02:54.
45
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/Deleos on 2024-11-08 13:55:07.
46
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-08 10:02:45.
47
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/RenatsMC on 2024-11-08 08:28:46.
48
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/atbest10 on 2024-11-08 02:41:29.
49
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/mockingbird- on 2024-11-08 01:05:22.
50
 
 
The original post: /r/amd by /u/FastDecode1 on 2024-11-07 20:55:52.
view more: ‹ prev next ›