[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

@foxy @danish @openstreetmap you need to differentiate between reusing existing nodes for other purposes (as in your example), which irl works against preserving history, and using an existing element for a new or different facility in the same place (there is some grey area there obviously).

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

@danish @openstreetmap naturally I do have to add one nerdy and nitpicking observation. It is actually "nearly all elements in OSM", as versioning was introduced with API 0.6 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_changes_between_v0.5_and_v0.6 in March 2009, elements deleted before that date are literally gone.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

@danish @openstreetmap in general edit the existing one, all elements in OSM are versioned and it is considered best practice to maintain the history of objects.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

@gislars @Strubbl @FOSSGISeV @panoramax @osm_fr @openstreetmap

Die Rechtspraxis in DE ist aktuell so, dass ihr vor allem einen guten Anwalt benötigen würdet.

simon

joined 2 years ago