charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Someone who is fired for good cause generally doesn't qualify. If they're fired without being at fault, or if they quit for a good reason, then that's different.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Again, it varies, but it's usually based on your earnings in the most recent quarter, and is usually funded by your most recent employer.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (5 children)

It's a state-run program, so it varies. Most states provide up to 26 weeks (6 months). No state provides fewer than 14 weeks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This is why I appreciate the scene in Undiscovered Country where Kronos One glides into view, seeming to align itself to the Enterprise's orientation.

https://youtu.be/AkqZja1IBfk?t=129

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

I'm a professional in the industry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (7 children)

It's probably not an eviction notice, but a "comply or vacate" notice. Journalists often confuse "eviction notice", which is a court order, with the sort of formal written demand notices that tenants are entitled to receive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

It will vary by state, but generally:

When only one of the two parties is unwilling to continue the employer-employee relationship, it is obvious who is the moving party. If employment was still available to the claimant and the claimant refused to continue working, then the claimant is the moving party. If the employer will not allow the claimant to continue work, even though the claimant wants to, then the employer is the moving party.

https://edd.ca.gov/en/uibdg/Voluntary_Quit_VQ_5/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

A system being slow and inefficient makes defrauding that system similarly slow and inefficient. To affect an election run on paper ballots you have to somehow physically alter or insert thousands or millions of pieces of paper without being detected. This will mean spending large amounts of time and money and must necessarily involve numerous people.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Manual in person voting is not easily scammed on a scale that can swing an election. The slow, inefficient, in person, physical process is a security feature.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I would say that "electronic voting" means that the ballot itself is digital rather than physical. So, scantrons are not electronic voting and voter registries/ID/etc. are not ballots in the first place.

view more: ‹ prev next ›