171
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They are nuts. Their license means that you give up all of your authorship rights to the code you contribute, and on top of that you’re not allowed to distribute modified source, nor can you fork the source for any purpose.

Edit: lol

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

So many forks, lol.

Winamp go fork yourself!

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

It really forks the llamas ass!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Does that actually matter?
I'm asking because license stuff is over my head, but I'd like to learn about it more.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They basically want free labor.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

If you only care about contributing improvements, no, it doesn't matter.

If you want to at least be recognized as an author, and be able to say "I made this", the license opposes that.

Waiver of Rights: You waive any rights to claim authorship of the contributions […]

I don't know how they intend to accept contributions though. I guess code blocks in tickets or patch files? Forking is not allowed, so the typical fork + branch + create a pull request does not work.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago

Also, this isn't even compatible with copyright law in some countries. I.e here you can't give up authorship at all; you can only grant an irrevocable, perpetual license (that might even prohibit you from distribution yourself and such) but you'll always be able to say "I made this" no matter what their license says.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

The way I look at it is this: I want credit for the work I do, I should also be able to fork a repo that I work on, and I sure as hell don’t like giving up my rights if I can help it.

But others may feel different.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I guess, opening a PR without forking is possible, but hey that's sort of incredibly bullshit idea

[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago

It...seems like there may be some issues with the repo...

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

I love GitHub drama.

Anyone know if the Dolby code leak is going to lead to anything interesting, or had this code been leaked before? And how fucked are the Winamp folks?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Context:
https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp/issues/17

Confidential Dolby code was pushed, though just some headers files.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Thats golden !

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

And then they just push a new commit without the files, completely unaware that git keeps all versions of the code? I feel like this repo is going to disappear.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

This really whips the llama's ass

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

It was already on github 10 months and 3 months ago.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
171 points (95.7% liked)

Programming

17071 readers
408 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS